Sir,
I am writing about the lesson drilled to the students.
YM

On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 10:08 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Sir read again; nothing was any creation; substance as prakriti and
> purusha in the sankhya yoga was the principle of the NASADIYA SUKTAM. iF
> THERE WAS NOTHING HOW SOMETHING CAN OUT OF NOTHING?  pL READ SLOWLY AGAIN
> WITHOUT BIAS. thank U kr irs cARL SAGAN HAD ALSO WRITTEN ABOUT IT AND SINCE
> YOU HAVE READ CARL i WROTE IT K Rajaram  IRS  9324
>
> On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 at 10:13, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I have never been able to understand the lesson drilled as
>> fundamental,that matter can neither be created nor destroyed.Then how has
>> matter come into existence at all.
>> Or as I have been writing all the while,when you analyze everything down
>> to the nothing after the subatomic particle,you come across the abstract
>> reality of nothing.So matter can neither be created nor destroyed because
>> there is no matter at all in the first place but only the maya or illusion.
>> YM
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 9:37 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> 1st Law of Thermodynamics - Energy cannot be created or destroyed.
>>>
>>> KR:    Matter can neither be created nor be destroyed; Vedic Bowdeekam
>>> means Physics.
>>>
>>> Vedic Principle from verse 1.2 Brihadaranyaka Upanishad through the
>>> readings of Krishna nanda:
>>>
>>>   “naiveha kiṁcanāgra āsīt, mṛtyunaivedam āvṛtam āsīt, aśanāyayā,
>>> aśanāyā hi mṛtyuḥ; tan mano'kuruta ātmanvī syām iti. so'rcann acarat,
>>> tasyārcata. āpojāyanta, arcate vai me kam abhūd iti; tad evārkasya
>>> arkatvam; kaṁ ha vā asmai bhavati, ya evam etad arkasya arkatvaṁ veda. “
>>>
>>> The verse arose from Rig Veda NASADIYA SUKTAM.
>>>
>>>        Originally, there was nothing. (The word NOTHING is to be
>>> carefully followed; Vedas do not speak untruth).  Death was enveloping
>>> everything. That is all the meaning, literally, of this sentence.(KR:
>>> NOTHING means it is not shunya; it is the glory of death enveloping all
>>> That is all).  In the beginning of things, what was there? Nothing was
>>> there. There was a devouring, all-consuming death principle, as it were; 
>>> nothing
>>> else can we conceive. In the Veda, also, there is this very same point
>>> reflected in the Nāsadīya Sūkta, which proclaims that, in the beginning, 
>>> *there
>>> was neither existence, nor non-existence*. What was there, originally?
>>> Darkness enveloped, as it were, because there *was not the light of
>>> sensory perception*. {KR absence of evidence is not the absence of the
>>> existent of any evidence) What we call light is nothing but the *capacity
>>> of the senses to perceive*. When the senses cannot perceive, we say
>>> there is no light. [KR: It was there; but we lacked the sense to
>>> perceive, so we said nothing} In pitch darkness, a kind of light exists;
>>> but the eyes are incapable of catching the ray of that light. That
>>> frequency is quite different from the one that is necessary for the eyes to
>>> perceive. So, when there was no possibility of external consciousness,
>>> when there was no sensory activity, when there was no distinction between
>>> the subject and the object, when the seer was not distinguishable from the
>>> seen, what was there?
>>>
>>>       Nothing was there! *Naiveha kiṁcanāgra āsīt:* Originally, nothing
>>> was there, because our idea of 'something' is an 'object'. There is no
>>> object present, because the object enters the subject, and vice versa.
>>> Creation is nothing but the projection of externality in Indivisible Being.
>>> The creation of the universe, therefore, is not actually the
>>> manufacture of a new substance. *In creation, a new thing is not
>>> created, because nothing can come from nothing*. If a new thing is to
>>> be created, it must have been produced out of nothing. How can 'nothing'
>>> produce 'something'? This is illogical. The effect must have existed in
>>> some causal state. This causal state is the substance of the universe. Now,
>>> what is actually the distinctive mark of the universe that is created, as
>>> different from the original causal condition? In what way does the effect
>>> get differentiated from the cause? If everything that is in the effect is
>>> in the cause, what is the distinctive feature, what is the distinguishing
>>> mark, which separates the effect from the cause? If the effect is entirely
>>> different from the cause, we cannot posit a cause at all, because the cause
>>> is non-existent. If the cause is non-existent, the effect also would be
>>> non-existent. So, the cause must have contained the effect in a primordial
>>> state; and, therefore, nothing can be visualised in the effect which could
>>> not have been in the cause. In a sense, therefore, what is in the
>>> effect is what is in the cause. The effect is the cause. There is no
>>> final non-distinction between the effect and the cause, inasmuch as in
>>> substance they are the same. But yet, we make a distinction between the two.
>>>
>>>        Now, when the effect gets psychologically isolated from the
>>> cause, there is the seed sown for the further diversity of creation. The
>>> two become four, four become eight, eight become sixteen, and multiplicity,
>>> thus, proceeds from the original Single Atom of the cosmos. And, when this
>>> diversity, which is creation, is conceived as possible and capable of being
>>> hiddenly present in the cause, we have to assume, also, a peculiar potency
>>> in the cause, which becomes the reason behind the manifestation of
>>> diversity. This is called the Śakti in certain philosophies, the force,
>>> energy, that is present in consciousness, a peculiar indistinguishable,
>>> indescribable, eluding something, without the assumption of which creation
>>> cannot be assumed. And, sometimes, people call it Māya, merely because they
>>> cannot understand what it is. It is not a substance that exists. It is
>>> rather an inability to grasp the meaning of it; that is all.
>>>
>>>      So, this cosmological process, the development of the effect from
>>> the cause, gradually, from the Universal Being, down to the lowest of
>>> diverse elements – this it is that is described here in this Brāhmaṇa,
>>> which says that originally nothing was, from where the element of
>>> distinction between the subject and the object, characterised by a double
>>> activity of grasping and separation, was evolved, and then arose the Cosmic
>>> Mind, Hiraṇyagarbha.There will be nothing more in the Absolute than what we
>>> see in the individual. This conclusion also will follow, if this assumption
>>> is correct; and it is a very uncomfortable conclusion, because we are
>>> not seeking in the Absolute merely what is in us. *A million people put
>>> together cannot be regarded as qualitatively superior to what a single
>>> individual is*. It is also held that the Absolute is transcendent in
>>> the sense that it has no connection at all with the visible universe.
>>> Often, it is also held that the Absolute is so much absorbed in the
>>> universe that we cannot find it outside the universe. So, we have theories
>>> and theories, and doctrines and doctrines.
>>>
>>> Then application of then philosophy of all the time existent, long after
>>> became a also known as 1 law of thermodynamics. Then followed by water
>>> fire etc as seen below in the next verse; and so science was found by us so
>>> early but the less educated west taught us the science as if freshly found
>>> by them ; so they cannot educate us.
>>>
>>> II   āpo vā arkaḥ. tad yad apāṁ śara āsīt, tat samahanyata, sā pṛithivy
>>> abhavat, tasyām aśrāmyat. tasya śrāntasya taptasya tejo raso
>>> niravartatāgniḥ.
>>>
>>> Here, again, we have some description of the condensation of the dense
>>> form of things, gradually taking place in the process of creation – the
>>> subtle becomes gross. The cosmic waters hardened, as it were, became solid,
>>> gradually, and the Earth element was formed. By the Earth element, what is
>>> meant here is not merely this little globe of the earth on which we are
>>> living, but the entire Earth Principle of the whole astronomical universe,
>>> through which your eyes cannot pass. The whole element of Earth can be
>>> regarded as the solidified form of this cosmic condition, the subtle nature
>>> of things which is called here, Waters. It solidified itself. From Fire
>>> comes Water; from Water comes Earth. This is the chronological order of
>>> creation of the gross forms, ordinarily speaking. Sā pṛithivy abhavat: That
>>> became the Earth, the grossened form of things.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here is the end of Cosmic creation. There is a famous passage in a text
>>> of the Vedānta, known as Panchadaśi, written by Sage Vidyāraṇya, who
>>> describes this in one Sloka:
>>>
>>>    Iksānadi-praveśāntā ṣṛṣhtirīśena kalpitā. Jāgradādi-vimokṣhantah
>>> samsāro jivīkalpitaḥ. “
>>>
>>>     This passage of the Upaniṣhad, and such other passages are given
>>> their meaning in this verse of the Panchadaśi. From the Cosmic Will down to
>>> Divine Immanence, it is Īshvara's creation. From walking till liberation,
>>> it is the individual's creation. Īshvara's creation or God's creation ends
>>> with the manifestation of the universal physical form, and God is not
>>> responsible for what the individual is experiencing. The loves and sorrows,
>>> the joys and pains, the births and deaths of the individual are not created
>>> by God. They are created by some other factor which is not to be attributed
>>> to God. The condensation of the cosmos, right from the causal condition
>>> down to the physical, through the subtle, may be said to be the manifesting
>>> activity of God. He becomes the 'All' and becomes also the consciousness of
>>> the 'All'. But the reversal of attitude, the considering of the object as
>>> the subject and the subject as the object, and the desire to grab objects
>>> for the purpose of personal satisfaction, and the capacity to fulfil
>>> certain desires and the incapacity to fulfil certain others, the getting
>>> fatigued in personality on account of the inability to fulfil all desires,
>>> the falling into sleep every day on account of the latent condition of
>>> desires unfulfilled, etc. – these are all the phenomena of individuality,
>>> not of Cosmic Being. Even the 'process' of Mokṣha, or liberation, is not
>>> God's creation, because God has no Mokṣha. He is always in the state of
>>> Mokṣha only.
>>>
>>>        THUS 1ST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS IF UNDERSTOOD CORRECTLY LEADS US
>>> TO MOSHA.
>>>
>>>       Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> 2nd Law of Thermodynamics - For a spontaneous process, the entropy of
>>> the universe increases.
>>>
>>> YMji was here. Entropy. Entropy is a scientific concept that is most
>>> commonly associated with a state of disorder, randomness, or uncertainty. 
>>> The
>>> disambiguation. When did that disorder take place? In PRALAYAM AND
>>> AFTER; so what went into the fold which alone existed, was not visible, as
>>> there was no sense perception to see in the darkness, even though there was
>>> light; we felt it was dark. IT WAS THERE AND UNFOLDED IN SRISHTI OR NAME IT
>>> AS SRISHTI, whereas, it was a manifestation. What was our mind’s perception
>>> therefore may not be the truth. The manifestation cause had the effect of
>>> heat; heat spread to cold places; Entropy was caused. Water running from
>>> high to low is principle so also entropy. HENCE THERE WAS NO EXCEPTION TO
>>> ANYTHING HAD ONE DONE PHYSICS WELL OR ANCIENT VEDAS GOOD AT LEAST. And
>>> since matter cannot be erased out, all that high heat energy, reduced to
>>> normal energy, must be there to recycle; and that recycling is happening
>>> all around us, effecting, in chain reaction as heat, winter rain etc etc.
>>>
>>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> 3rd Law of Thermodynamics - A perfect crystal at *zero Kelvin* has zero
>>> entropy.
>>>
>>> To reach zero kelvins, you would require an infinite amount of work. And
>>> even if you could get there, quantum mechanics dictates that the atoms
>>> and molecules would still have some irreducible motion. That is an
>>> utopia where unless all atom motions were immovables only THAT ABSOLUTE
>>> ZERO WILL BE REACHED; Now again go to Vedic 1st; it was dark; and there
>>> was nothing; IS NOT TRUE, BECAUSE THERE SHALL ALWAYS BE SOME AATOM
>>> MOVEMENTS; BUT OUR PERCEPTION OF THE MIND WITH THE INABILITY TO SEE THROUGH
>>> THE DARKNESS, INITIATED 0 TO 100, 32 TO 212 AND THEN MINUS TEMP ETC WHICH
>>> ARE ALL ABOVE kelvin zero or VEDIC CONCEPT SHOWED THE MOVEMENT OF BRAHMAM.
>>> It was cold there but as momentum was there, manifestation when starting
>>> again, heat energy can be generated leading to entropy. So, The
>>> Brihadaranyaka Upanishad and the Rig veda Nasadiya suktam became A
>>> WONDERFUL SCIENCE; AND IN SCIENCE EXCEPTIONS ARE NOT THERE; BUT ONLY IN OUR
>>> MINDS AND PERCEPTION WITH THE CONDITIONED STATUS. So higher can impart
>>> knowledge to lower and vice versa is impossible.  K RAJARAM IRS  9324
>>>
>>> On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 21:56, 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123 <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Respected sir,
>>>>
>>>> "( An Idiot whose education is less cannot educate a person who is more
>>>> educated, unless he shouts and bluffs that his shouting is educating.)"
>>>>
>>>> I enjoyed the *exception* to the law of thermodynamics
>>>> Gopalakrishnan
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, 9 March, 2024 at 08:36:26 am IST, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Mar*Thermodynamics and Perception Symbiosis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thermodynamics is a study of heat and heat changes. Heat means the
>>>> movement of molecules and atoms in a system. When the movement is more the
>>>> heat will be more. When the movement is less the heat or temperature will
>>>> be less. When there is no movement at all it is absolute zero where there
>>>> is no movement of molecules or atoms at all, but only the electromagnetic
>>>> waves zooming at the speed of light.
>>>>
>>>> One of the basic principles of Thermodynamics is that the heat from a
>>>> body where the temperature is more moves into a body whose temperature is
>>>> comparatively less. The heat from the body whose temperature is less cannot
>>>> move into a body whose temperature is more. When the heat in the two bodies
>>>> is same then there is the Thermal equilibrium that is there will be no heat
>>>> exchange or the movement of molecules between the two bodies.( An Idiot
>>>> whose education is less cannot educate a person who is more educated,
>>>> unless he shouts and bluffs that his shouting is educating.)
>>>>
>>>> Now let us apply this principle to the Biosphere. Heat from an organism
>>>> whose temperature is more will be moving into organisms whose temperature
>>>> is less. It means that the excessive activity or heat from that organism
>>>> moves into the organisms which are less active. The more active organisms
>>>> or organisms with more life transfer their surplus to organisms which are
>>>> less active and deficient of life. The healthy and active organisms
>>>> automatically transfer health to the less active and less healthy
>>>> organisms. The organisms are not in the deadly Darwinian war. They
>>>> automatically help each other. Nature has constituted the symbiosis.
>>>>
>>>> Activity always is activity with perception in nature.Machines are not
>>>> natural at all. They interfere in the automatic perception or thermal
>>>> transfer. The whole activity among the organisms of the Biosphere is
>>>> actually symbiotic perception and understanding. The Biosphere as one
>>>> single organism is students helping students. Technology is disease for the
>>>> Biosphere, ultimately the single organism.
>>>>
>>>> The basic law of Thermodynamics is the basic law of education to the
>>>> Biosphere wherein all organisms enjoy and learn. Active molecules from the
>>>> active organisms move into the less active organisms and thus distribute
>>>> perception and understanding. In free nature where there is no human
>>>> tampering, all organisms not only get health and strength, but also
>>>> continuous education.
>>>>
>>>> The lifeline of education from nature, the continuous revelations laden
>>>> education has been cut by our economic destruction. We are fooling not only
>>>> ourselves but also every other organism. In fact we have diseasified the
>>>> natural evolution. Evolution is actually education into higher levels by
>>>> all organisms which mutate symbiotically. Natural evolution is the growth
>>>> of the Biosphere with more education.
>>>>
>>>> It is growth with education and health where education and health are
>>>> one and same. In free and healthy nature, nature makes you healthy
>>>> continuously; in fact creating new mutations to keep you healthy. Your
>>>> health is the result of the symbiosis among all organisms and also nature
>>>> as Thermodynamics.
>>>>
>>>> The human has become the chronic disease of nature. The human has to
>>>> take to self curing. The first step is to free economics from the
>>>> mechanical paradigm and make ecology as the basic paradigm.
>>>>
>>>> Rene Descartes with his mechanical paradigm dealt the great death blow
>>>> to nature. Darwin studied the Biosphere as the food chain, not as
>>>> emotionally linked and symbiotic life forms. He actually ate every animal
>>>> he researched. My God, the deadly ‘Ds’, Descartes, Darwin and Dawkins,have
>>>> taken us all into the fanaticism of technology. The natural emotional
>>>> symbiosis has been killed.
>>>>
>>>> And no University can get freedom from the frenzy for more and more
>>>> technology or assaults on nature.
>>>>
>>>> YM
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "iyer123" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/39442903.1299820.1709956561591%40mail.yahoo.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/39442903.1299820.1709956561591%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> *Mar*
>>
>

-- 
*Mar*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLb8kdafkbQ5jtf32u_Sfj5L3he7Kyi1xwSvctF3VmLMQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to