Sigmund Freud says that 80% of the people are only human-in-obedience, doing what is expected to be done. They cannot think beyond or they were tuned, so, not to. But I would like to alter your sentence a little differently. A lawyer (or anyone you can substitute here) must know law, but need not byheart all of them; knowledge with memory is shruti; so many know-how are oly absolute requirements in life which will go unnoticed in certain periods; thus a know how of law is essential, without which one may not be able to immediately open and show and shut. I had read Kanga and Palkhivala 7 vol at least > 15 times. I do not remember the case laws and I do not wish to also. But the knowhow makes my alert mind flash where the solution to the problem exists approximately in chapter; so open ,present and shut. About person may be one who presents it to you when you were in your second career on the bench viz who is giving that to you receiving from me. That benchman need not know law at all; about law. about personality. And the headline reminds me of something or someone else to call about. K Rajaram IRS 12624
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 at 22:17, Rangarajan T.N.C. <[email protected]> wrote: > I think I am also an about person. A lawyer does not have to know law, he > must only know where to find it and show it to the judge and clients! > > ----- Forwarded message ----- > *From:* Padmanabha Vyasamoorthy <[email protected]> > I am an 'about' person! Kindly see the attachment. > > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZorxBvM1N1nQNwdcAHp%3DunrccphL1mWnG3x75H6U5Jmadw%40mail.gmail.com.
