CULTURAL QA 06-2024-25

TOPIC- HISTORY. BASE QUORA QA- Compiled

Q1             Would the average peasant in medieval times even recognize
their king if he walked right up to them?

KR                  I have a distorted feeling of some misinformed facts
sewed as if a pattern of cloth. In the History of any nation, a king was
known well by his face since most regime issued coins with their face. And
television might give a distorted version of aa person while, assembling at
the courthall and  on occasions did reveal the kings from their balcony.

                  As far as India is concerned, earliest authentic king was
RAMA. In Valmiki Ramayanam, Rama Pattabishekam and Rama leaving for the
forest are very well depicted where, not only peasants, but, various cross
sections of the public are described. We will teach like Cyrus who do not
know all these. For sample:

1     Book I : Bala Kanda - Book Of Youthful Majesties   Chapter [Sarga] 6
Introduction

2     Book II : Ayodhya Kanda - Book Of Ayodhya   Chapter[Sarga] 5

3     Book II : Ayodhya Kanda - Book Of Ayodhya     Chapter[Sarga] 6

4      Book II : Ayodhya Kanda - Book Of Ayodhya     Chapter[Sarga] 16

5       Book II : Ayodhya Kanda - Book Of Ayodhya   Chapter[Sarga] 45,46,47

Q2             As you know, the name Hind was created by the Persians since
our land was at Indus River, but what was Hinduism called before that?

KR                  In spite of repetitions, still HIND is taken out of
hearsay and attributions earlier system as shat matham worship, proving
again the mis concept.  Of course, I do not expect a less knowledge person
to know what was then sanathana dharma; Hinduism is verbal descriptions of
Indians as we are even now called, if India means only Delhi. (West does
not know win India anything but Delhi only).  Vedic periods and sanathana
dharma till 500 BCE or 750 AD, as people would like to prefer, there were
only yagnas and General Pujas of all types. We were called by that nation
within India called; and we were Sanatanis, Gnanis, and Pundits etc; Only
when another religion entered in Delhi, as they were Muslims, they called
the non-Muslims as Sindu occupants; they never knew what was beyond that.
There is no meaning for Hindu. But who named the religion as HINDU? It was
the British. History speaks about it all. Shan Matha worship was introduced
only by Adi Shankara and hence I said 500 BCE or 750 AD. But even in 1000
Ad when Ramanuja was there, we were only sanatanis. And smaartas. There was
nothing like any real religion was here. So, we would have been known only
by the ruling tribes as and when the history had. British for Law wanted a
common name; so he said Sindhi as Hindi or Hindu and Hinduism. Before that
atleast in 10000 years, we were a chola or a Chunga national; and addressed
by name and Varna; worship by Icon started very late. Even then, Lingas no
shape alone was known. But we are yet to become an Indian and still calling
ourselves by bias only in the old names of no fruition at all. We are all
ignorant of our past. Or else there will not be a poor place for us as to
be regretfully spoken by Nitin Gadkari.

Q3             What are some of the interesting facts about Patna?

KR            Every one knows Bihar as Patali putra, Gupta -Morya and many
more ruled places with repute which is degraded bow by Lallu prasad and
Nithish Kumar. A rich place of knowledge and wealth once, beacon of India;
but even today the genes are there or else we wont het 450 civil servants
from a place every year.

      Pataliputra (modern-day Patna in Bihar, India) was one of the most
important cities in ancient India, particularly during the Mauryan and
subsequent periods. Here are some historical facts about Pataliputra:

Mauryan Capital: Pataliputra was the capital of the Mauryan Empire, which
was founded by Chandragupta Maurya around 322 BCE. Under Chandragupta and
his grandson Ashoka, Pataliputra became a prosperous political, economic,
and cultural center of ancient India.

Strategic Location: Situated at the confluence of the Ganges (Ganga) and
Son rivers, Pataliputra had a strategic location that facilitated trade,
communication, and defense. Its proximity to the river systems made it an
important hub for riverine transport and commerce.

Architectural Marvels: Pataliputra was known for its impressive
architecture, including the Mauryan Pillars and various palaces and
administrative buildings constructed during the Mauryan period. The city
was adorned with gardens, parks, and public amenities.

Cultural Center: As the capital of the Mauryan Empire, Pataliputra
attracted scholars, artists, and intellectuals from different parts of
India and beyond. It played a significant role in the development and
spread of Buddhism, particularly under Ashoka's patronage.

Administration: Pataliputra served as the administrative center of the
Mauryan Empire, with an organized bureaucracy and a sophisticated system of
governance. The Arthashastra, written by Chanakya (Kautilya), provides
insights into the administrative practices of the Mauryan capital.

Historical References: Pataliputra is mentioned in various ancient texts,
including Buddhist scriptures, Greek accounts (such as those by
Megasthenes), and later Indian historical writings. These references
provide insights into its political importance and cultural vibrancy. *****

Later Periods: After the decline of the Mauryan Empire, Pataliputra
continued to be a significant city under subsequent dynasties, including
the Gupta Empire and the Pala Empire. It remained an important center of
trade, culture, and religious activities.

Archaeological Excavations: Archaeological excavations in and around Patna
have uncovered remains of ancient Pataliputra, including ruins of
fortifications, palaces, stupas, and pottery, confirming its historical
importance and urban development.

Overall, Pataliputra stands as a testament to the rich history and cultural
heritage of ancient India, particularly during the Mauryan period, when it
flourished as one of the greatest cities in the ancient world.

*****  references and sources that provide historical insights into
Pataliputra:

"The Edicts of King Asoka" translated by Ven. S. Dhammika: This book
includes translations of Ashoka's inscriptions, some of which mention
Pataliputra and its significance during the Mauryan period.

"The Arthashastra" attributed to Chanakya (Kautilya): This ancient Indian
treatise on statecraft, economic policy, and military strategy provides
details about the administration and governance of Pataliputra during the
Mauryan Empire.

Greek Accounts: Accounts by Greek ambassadors and travelers such as
Megasthenes provide valuable information about Pataliputra and its
political, social, and cultural aspects during the Mauryan period. These
accounts are referenced in various historical texts.

Buddhist Texts: Buddhist scriptures, including the Jataka tales and
accounts of pilgrims, mention Pataliputra as a thriving city and a center
of Buddhist learning and propagation during the time of Ashoka and later
periods.

Archaeological Findings: Excavations conducted by the Archaeological Survey
of India (ASI) and other institutions in and around Patna (modern-day
Pataliputra) have unearthed ancient remains, including city walls, palaces,
stupas, and artifacts that provide evidence of the city's historical
significance.

Historical Studies and Journals: Academic journals and studies by
historians and archaeologists specializing in ancient Indian history often
discuss Pataliputra's role as a political capital, its architectural
features, and its cultural contributions.

Q4             What are the weirdest historical facts?

Q      During World War II, a Great Dane named Juliana was awarded the Blue
Cross Medal. ...

KR         IT WAS NOT FUN SOMETHING SERIOUS. During World War II, a Great
Dane named Juliana was indeed awarded the Blue Cross Medal for her service
and bravery. Juliana was owned by Air Raid Precautions (ARP) warden Air
Raid No. 1 Post in London, and she was credited with helping to rescue 117
people from the rubble of buildings destroyed during the Blitz, the intense
bombing campaign by Nazi Germany against the United Kingdom. The Blue Cross
Medal is awarded by the UK-based animal charity, Blue Cross, to recognize
animals that have shown exceptional courage and devotion to duty. Juliana's
actions during the war exemplified her bravery and her role in assisting in
rescue operations during a time of great peril and danger. Juliana's story
is a testament to the important roles that animals, including dogs, played
during wartime, not only as companions but also as working animals that
contributed to rescue efforts and provided comfort and support to civilians
and military personnel alike.

Q      Alexander the Great was accidentally buried alive. ...

KR:     Again even as fun is a myth. The claim that Alexander the Great was
accidentally buried alive is not supported by historical evidence and is
widely regarded as a myth or legend rather than a factual occurrence.
Here's why:

 The primary sources and historical accounts of Alexander the Great's life,
such as those by ancient historians like Plutarch, Arrian, and Diodorus
Siculus, do not mention any such incident of Alexander being buried alive.
During Alexander's time, the Greeks and Macedonians had well-established
burial customs and rituals. It would have been highly unlikely for someone
of Alexander's stature and status to be mistakenly buried alive without
proper verification of death. Alexander the Great died in Babylon in 323
BCE at the age of 32. The cause of his death is believed to be either from
illness (possibly malaria or typhoid fever) or poisoning, though the exact
circumstances remain debated among historians. There is no evidence to
suggest that he was mistakenly buried while still alive. After Alexander's
death, his body was embalmed and prepared for transport back to Macedon.
His generals, including Ptolemy I and Seleucus I, were involved in the
arrangements for his funeral and the subsequent division of his empire. While
myths and legends often surround famous historical figures like Alexander
the Great, the idea that he was accidentally buried alive does not align
with the historical records and practices of the time. His death and the
events following it are well-documented in ancient sources, focusing on his
legacy and the political repercussions of his passing rather than such a
sensationalized account.

Q     Cleopatra married two of her brothers. ...

KR        YES; but real history is: “Marriage to Ptolemy XIII: Cleopatra
VII was born into the Ptolemaic dynasty, which ruled Egypt after Alexander
the Great's conquests. She married her younger brother, Ptolemy XIII, as
was customary among the Ptolemaic rulers to maintain dynastic control.
Their marriage occurred around 51 BCE when Cleopatra ascended to the throne
jointly with Ptolemy XIII after the death of their father, Ptolemy XII
Auletes. Marriage to Ptolemy XIV: After Ptolemy XIII's death, Cleopatra
married her younger brother Ptolemy XIV, who became co-ruler with her.
Ptolemy XIV was around 11 or 12 years old at the time of their marriage,
and Cleopatra acted as his regent and dominated Egyptian politics. Later
Relationships: Cleopatra's most famous romantic relationship was with
Julius Caesar, with whom she had a son named Caesarion. After Caesar's
assassination in 44 BCE, Cleopatra formed a relationship with the Roman
general Mark Antony, with whom she had three children. Cleopatra's
marriages to her brothers were primarily political alliances aimed at
maintaining control over Egypt within the Ptolemaic dynasty. Her
relationships with Julius Caesar and Mark Antony were pivotal in shaping
the later stages of her reign and her place in history as one of the most
iconic figures of ancient Egypt.

  Q    A Pope once ordered a Medieval purge of black cats. ...

KR        YES AS CONNECTED TO WITCH CRAAFT; Overall, the medieval purge of
black cats reflects the intersection of superstition, fear, and cultural
beliefs during a tumultuous period in European history. It serves as a
reminder of how animals have often been caught in the crossfire of human
fears and beliefs throughout history.

Q       Napoleon was once attacked by rabbits. ...

KR     MOT AUTHENTIC. The story that Napoleon Bonaparte was attacked by
rabbits is a popular myth rather than a factual historical event. Here’s a
breakdown of the origin and context of this myth.  The myth likely stems
from a humorous anecdote about Napoleon's military campaign in Spain.
According to the story, during his retreat from Spain in 1808, Napoleon's
army encountered a large number of rabbits. The soldiers, who were hungry
and exhausted, reportedly tried to catch and eat the rabbits. This incident
was exaggerated over time, leading to the humorous exaggeration that the
rabbits attacked Napoleon. Over the years, the story evolved into a
humorous legend where Napoleon, faced with a swarm of rabbits, was
supposedly overwhelmed or at least annoyed by their presence. This
embellished tale has persisted in popular culture and has been referenced
in various forms of literature and media. There is no credible historical
evidence to support the claim that rabbits attacked Napoleon or posed a
significant threat to him during any military campaign. Napoleon faced
numerous challenges and adversaries during his campaigns, but rabbits were
not among them in any serious or documented manner.

Q      A Roman Emperor {once made his horse a Senator}

KR        Myth. While the story of Incitatus being appointed as a senator
or consul is widely cited in historical accounts, including those by
ancient historians, its factual accuracy is questionable. It is likely an
exaggeration or symbolic tale meant to criticize Caligula’s rule rather
than a literal appointment.   The notion of a horse being appointed as a
senator in ancient Rome primarily revolves around the story of Caligula and
his horse Incitatus. It serves as a reminder of the political satire and
criticism prevalent in ancient Roman writings about emperors and their
extravagant behaviour.

Q      Wealthy Europeans committed cannibalism 500 years ago

KR      All over the earth including Kabalikas practiced Cannibalism. In
general in those days, different causes of cannibalism existed including
Europe as medicine:

Survival Cannibalism: This is perhaps the most well-known form of
cannibalism, where individuals or groups resort to eating human flesh for
survival during extreme conditions such as famines, shipwrecks, or being
stranded in remote areas. Famous examples include the Donner Party in 1846
and the survivors of the 1972 Andes flight disaster.

Ritualistic Cannibalism: Some cultures have practiced cannibalism as part
of religious rituals or ceremonies. For example, certain ancient
Mesoamerican civilizations, such as the Aztecs, practiced ritualistic
cannibalism as part of their religious beliefs and ceremonies.

Warfare and Conquest: Cannibalism has been reported in the context of
warfare and conquest, where victorious armies may consume the flesh of
defeated enemies as a symbol of dominance or to instill fear. Historical
accounts suggest instances of cannibalism during sieges and wars.

Medicinal or Magical Beliefs: In some cultures, human body parts or flesh
were believed to have medicinal properties or were used in magical
practices. This led to instances of cannibalism where individuals consumed
human flesh for perceived health benefits or spiritual reasons.

Cultural and Social Taboos: In most societies, cannibalism is considered
taboo and is met with strong moral and legal prohibitions. Cases of
cannibalism often provoke horror and disgust, leading to severe social and
legal consequences for those involved.

Anthropological Studies: Anthropologists and historians study instances of
cannibalism to understand cultural practices, survival strategies, and the
social contexts in which such practices occur. These studies help shed
light on the complexities of human behaviour and cultural diversity.

"Cannibalism: From Sacrifice to Survival" by Hans Ashkenazy: This book
traces the history of cannibalism from ritualistic practices to survival
scenarios, exploring its evolution and cultural implications.

Q              An author "predicted" the sinking of the Titanic

KR       A myth. There is a persistent myth that a novel or story predicted
the sinking of the Titanic before it happened. However, there is no
credible evidence to support this claim. The sinking of the Titanic on
April 15, 1912, was a tragic event that shocked the world due to the loss
of life and the circumstances surrounding the sinking of the supposedly
unsinkable ship.Here are some key points regarding predictions or purported
premonitions about the Titanic sinking:

Fictional Accounts: There are several fictional stories and novels that
involve ships sinking in similar circumstances to the Titanic disaster. One
notable example is Morgan Robertson's novella "Futility, or the Wreck of
the Titan," published in 1898, which features a fictional ocean liner named
Titan that sinks after striking an iceberg in the North Atlantic. Despite
similarities in details like the ship's size, speed, and location of the
disaster, these similarities are considered coincidental rather than
prophetic. While there are fictional works that have similarities to the
Titanic disaster, there is no verifiable prediction or prophecy that
foretold the actual sinking of the Titanic before it tragically occurred in
1912. The sinking of the Titanic remains a historical event remembered for
its impact on maritime safety, technology, and the human cost of the
disaster.

Q5             Who were the first people to ride horses?

KR                  Another flawed data. Dr Kalyana Sundaram had given two
evidences of horses here in India one as:  Indus Valley Civilization:
Archaeological excavations at sites like Mohenjo-Daro and Harappa in the
Indus Valley have uncovered depictions of horses on seals and artifacts
dating back to around 2500-2000 BCE. These representations suggest that
horses were known and possibly domesticated during this ancient
civilization. And two as NOW INDUS DATE IS PUSHED UP TO 7000 BCE WHEN THE
EVIDENCES OF HORSES IN Europe was never heard of .

K Rajaram IRS 24624 25624

On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 at 05:16, Gopala Krishnan <[email protected]> wrote:

> CULTURAL QA 06-2024-25
>
> TOPIC- HISTORY. BASE QUORA QA-  Compiled
>
> Q1             Would the average peasant in medieval times even recognize
> their king if he walked right up to them?
>
> A1             Cyrus II, Wise ruler20h
>
> The concept of a "celebrity king" as we know it today was virtually
> non-existent.
>
> There were no photos, no television, and certainly no social media. The
> king was more of a distant, almost mythical figure to most peasants.
>
> That said, there were a few ways a peasant might know their king's face.
>
> Royal decrees often carried an image of the king, though these were more
> likely seen by the literate few in towns and cities than by rural peasants.
>
> Even if a peasant saw these images, they were often stylized and not
> entirely accurate representations.
>
> Take them as medieval fan art rather than realistic portraits.For
> instance, the story of King Henry II of England. Known for his extensive
> travels across his realm, Henry was a hands-on ruler.Legend has it that
> during one of his journeys, he disguised himself as a commoner to mix with
> his subjects incognito.He supposedly enjoyed the anonymity, listening to
> the unfiltered opinions of his people.
>
> Then there’s Richard the Lionheart, Henry II’s son, who spent much of his
> reign on crusade or in captivity.When Richard was finally released and
> returned to England, the legend goes that his loyal minstrel, Blondel,
> roamed Europe singing a particular song known only to him and Richard.
>
> It’s said that Blondel found Richard by hearing him sing back the song
> from a castle tower.
>
> Of course, there were grand occasions when a peasant might catch a glimpse
> of their monarch.
>
> Royal processions, feast days, and court appearances were occasions when
> the king would make a public appearance.
>
> But even then, he’d be decked out in all his regalia, surrounded by a
> retinue of nobles and guards, making it hard to see him as just another man.
>
> Moreover, kings often didn’t want to be easily recognizable.
>
> *Traveling incognito was a way to avoid assassination plots* and
> experience the realm without the pomp and circumstance.
>
> One famous example is King James V of Scotland, who would dress as a
> commoner and travel among his people to see their true conditions and hear
> their grievances without the filter of his courtiers.
>
> But on the flip side, peasants had their daily lives revolved around their
> village, their lords, and their church.
>
> The local lord was often the most powerful and recognizable figure in
> their immediate world.
>
> My note- As far as India is considered, most of them came with all pomp,
> accompanied by assistants and soldiers. Even in the present demographic
> period, the ministers come in cars protected against bullet shoots, in the
> front and back an array of cars with police and security peoples.
>
> Q2             As you know, the name Hind was created by the Persians
> since our land was at Indus River, but what was Hinduism called before that?
>
> A2             Shreesh Kulkarni, Religions fascinates me Sun
>
> Well
>
> The term Hinduism was used by British to denote the set of all cultures
> practiced in the land of the Indian Subcontinent
>
> So before Hinduism we used to be called as per our real belief systems (
> called as Mata) like
>
> (1) Vaishnava (Follower of Lord Vishnu)
>
> (2) Shaiva (Follower of Lord Shiva)
>
> (3) Ganapatya (Follower of Lord Ganesha)
>
> (4( Shakta (Follower of Durga)
>
> (5) Saura (Follower of Surya (Sun god)
>
> (6) Kumara (Follower of Lord Kartikeya)
>
> Also as per our worship systems we used to be either classified as
>
> Shrautas (Followers of Shruti)
>
> Smartas (Followers pf Smriti)
>
> Pauranikas (Followers of Puranas)
>
> So this was our original identity
>
> I really want The current political dispensation of our country which aims
> to shed The colonial baggage of India (as they claim) to first stop the
> usage of the terms Hindu (which is of Persian origin) and Hinduism (which
> is of British origin) and instead start using the Indic terms.
>
> My note- Probably on account of this we started using Bharat at least in
> certain areas. Probably it may take decades to change from India in all
> fields. We say mera bharat hey, but still Indian parliament…
>
> Q3             What are some of the interesting facts about Patna?
>
> A3             Darshan, Sharing anything Jun 19
>
>  The name “Patna” derives from the ancient city of Pataliputra -
> Pataliputra was the capital of several ancient empires, including the
> Maurya Empire and the Gupta Empire.    Patna is one of the oldest
> continuously inhabited places in the world - Founded in 490 BCE by the
> king of Magadha.
>
>   Patna is home to several significant historical sites and monuments -
> These include the famous Golghar, Patna Museum, Kumhrar Archaeological
> Park, and Agam Kuan.
>
>  Mahatma Gandhi started his political career in Patna - He organized his
> first satyagraha (nonviolent protest) at the Gardanibagh area of the city
> in 1917.
>
>  The famous Nalanda University, an ancient center of learning, is located
> near Patna - It was one of the first residential universities in the world
> and attracted students from all over Asia.
>
> The famous mathematician Aryabhata was born in Patna.
>
>  The Patna Sahib Gurudwara is an important pilgrimage site for Sikhs - It
> is believed to be the birthplace of Guru Gobind Singh, the tenth Sikh Guru.
>
>  Patna is home to a number of ancient temples - The Mahavir Mandir, Patan
> Devi Temple, and Takht Sri Patna Sahib are highly revered by locals and
> visitors.
>
> The Patna High Court is one of the oldest high courts in India -
> Established in 1916, it is the highest judicial body in the state of Bihar.
>
> The Mahavir Mandir in Patna is one of the holiest Hindu temples dedicated
> to Lord Hanuman.
>
> Source : Internet
>
> Q4             What are the weirdest historical facts?
>
> A4             S.p,  Former Headmaster (Retired) (1984–2015)Jun 19
>
> Fun History Facts
>
>  During World War II, a Great Dane named Juliana was awarded the Blue
> Cross Medal. ...
>
> Alexander the Great was accidentally buried alive. ...
>
> There were female gladiators in Ancient Rome! ...
>
> The world's most successful pirate in history was a lady named Ching Shih.
>
>  Cleopatra married two of her brothers. ...
>
>   A Pope once ordered a Medieval purge of black cats. ...
>
>  Napoleon was once attacked by rabbits. ...
>
>   A Roman Emperor once made his horse a Senator
>
>  The all-time richest person lived in the 13th century
>
>  Wealthy Europeans committed cannibalism 500 years ago
>
> Byron once kept a pet bear while at university
>
>  An author "predicted" the sinking of the Titanic
>
> Q5             Who were the first people to ride horses?
>
> A5             Silk Road, Physics Connoisseur, AI Machine Learning.15h
>
>
>
> You see, pinpointing the exact dudes who first hopped on a horse and
> yelled, "Giddy-up!" is a tricky one.
>
> Unlike fancy chariots or statues bragging about victories, early horse
> riding didn't leave behind a lot of flashy evidence.
>
> However, archaeologists have been digging up clues, and those dusty bones
> are whispering some pretty interesting stories.
>
> *Based on recent digs, strong evidence suggests a group called the Yamnaya
> culture in Central Europe might be the frontrunners in this equestrian
> rodeo.*
>
> These folks lived around 4,500 to 5,000 years ago, and researchers
> examined skeletons found in their burial mounds.
>
> Now, you wouldn't think bones would snitch on horseback riding habits, but
> apparently, they can.
>
> The Yamnaya skeletons showed specific wear and tear patterns on their
> hips, thighs, and pelvis – basically, the parts that would get hammered by
> years of gripping a horse.
>
> These patterns are so distinct that scientists call it "horse rider
> syndrome" – a dead giveaway that them Yamnaya dudes weren't just strolling
> around the steppe.
>
> This Yamnaya theory isn't the only contender though.
>
> Over in Kazakhstan, there's another prehistoric crew called the Botai
> culture who might have had some skin in the game.
>
> Traces of horse milk and bones with possible bit marks date back to around
> 3600-3100 BCE, suggesting these folks were at least using horses for
> something more than just pulling carts.
>
> While there's no smoking gun proof of riding just yet, the Botai's close
> association with horses makes them strong contenders for an early adopter
> award.
>
> But, the jury's still out.
>
> The Yamnaya with their messed-up hips and the Botai with their horsey
> breakfast habits are the top two badasses in the running.
>
> One thing's for sure, whoever those first riders were, they started a
> trend that would change warfare, transportation, and probably inspire a
> whole lot of epic horseback battles throughout history.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "iyer123" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAEE2L%2B3OxswrGHdQMHNWBWZiuecSR2-cyoAp5tDVX-iNqFxbJQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAEE2L%2B3OxswrGHdQMHNWBWZiuecSR2-cyoAp5tDVX-iNqFxbJQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooFRa_Sirrq27WcOGnDcZqwzotY6tP6OwTah%3DRsJwzVBA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to