I saw the old man writing as,"Who can accurately predict that the
illegitimately-conceived child will certainly
be a blemishless son, and not a paraplegic mentally defective daughter?  "
I HAD A DOUBT; BUT NOW I UNDERSTOOD ABOUT HIM/HER
KR IRS 15724

On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 at 23:47, Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Dear folks
>
> Attempting,as usual, to swallow an elephant whole, super-bluffologist
> crocodile
> K R ex-IRS trots out his latest grand baseless lie that:-
>
> "*Niyoga (Sanskrit: नियोग) **is an ancient Hindu tradition, in which a
> woman (whose husband is either incapable of fatherhood or has died without
> having a child) would request and appoint a person for helping her bear a
> child.*"
>
> In fact, no such alleged "tradition" exists.
>
> In Hindu law, as well as any other law, no widow can "request and appoint"
> any person to impregnate her to produce a child, or otherwise.
>
> Such children would be illegitimate, on all counts.
>
> The forbidden incestual practice can bne traced to Yaajnivalkya, the rebel
> student who was kicked out of Veda-class for insubordinate behavior and
> forced to disgorge whatever he had learnt:-
>
> "*The practice of niyoga does not seem to be referred in terms of
> disapproval by Yājñavalkya. In fact, the texts of the Vyavahārādhyāya
> suggest that the son born of such a practice occupies a good position.
> Yājñavalkya declares that a son begotten by a sonless person on the soil of
> another man through legal appointment is lawful heir and can offer funeral
> cakes for both."*
>
> My comments:-
>
> Who can accurately predict that the illegitimately-conceived child will
> certainly
> be a blemishless son, and not a paraplegic mentally defective daughter?
>
> (Remember the famous dialogue between George Bernard Shaw and a woman
> who wanted a child by him with his brains?)
>
> "*In the Mahaabhaaratham written by Vyaasa, illegitimate Durganthi’s
> extra-marital illegitimate son black-skinned Kṛṣṇa Dvaipāyana Vyāsa who hd
> taken a vow of celibacy was directed by hos own mother to perform/commit
> Niyoga (rape/adultery) with the two widows Ambikaa and Ambaalikaa of dead
> King Vicitravīrya. From whom were born totally blind Dhṛtarāṣṭra and
> mottled-skin Pāndu, and from Ambaalikaa's maid Vidura."*
>
> "*W**hen the purpose of the appointment to (cohabit with) the widow bas
> been attained in accordance with the law, those two shall behave towards
> each other like a father and a daughter-in-law.*"
>
> My comments:-
>
> This incestuous practice accords with the Islamic practice whereby the
> lusty
> and lascivious aged Prophet Muhammad, seeing his young and voluptuous
> daughter-in-law Zaynab bint Jahsh scantily clad in her tent at night, got
> his son to divorce her, and married her himself.
>
> The old man man already had more than a dozen wives then, including
> little Aishah whom he obtained from her mother when she was six years old
> and he was fifty-three, and married her two years later.
>
> S Narayanaswamy Iyer
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 8:10 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Niyog and Nari   Part 1
>>
>> Niyoga (Sanskrit: नियोग) is an ancient Hindu tradition, in which a woman
>> (whose husband is either incapable of fatherhood or has died without having
>> a child) would request and appoint a person for helping her bear a child.
>> MEANS INJUNCTION
>>
>> n any case, to answer you question, the main place in Hindu scripture
>> where the rules of Niyoga are described is in this chapter of the Manu
>> Smriti:
>>
>> On failure of issue (by her husband) a woman who has been authorised, may
>> obtain, (in the) proper (manner prescribed), the desired offspring by
>> (cohabitation with) a brother-in-law or (with some other) Sapinda (of the
>> husband).
>>
>> He (who is) appointed to (cohabit with) the widow shall (approach her) at
>> night anointed with clarified butter and silent, (and) beget one son, by no
>> means a second.
>>
>> Some (sages), versed in the law, considering the purpose of the
>> appointment not to have been attained by those two (on the birth of the
>> first), think that a second (son) may be lawfully procreated on (such)
>> women.
>>
>> But when the purpose of the appointment to (cohabit with) the widow bas
>> been attained in accordance with the law, those two shall behave towards
>> each other like a father and a daughter-in-law.
>>
>> If those two (being thus) appointed deviate from the rule and act from
>> carnal desire, they will both become outcasts, (as men) who defile the bed
>> of a daughter-in-law or of a Guru.
>>
>> By twice-born men a widow must not be appointed to (cohabit with) any
>> other (than her husband); for they who appoint (her) to another (man), will
>> violate the eternal law.
>>
>> In the sacred texts which refer to marriage the appointment (of widows)
>> is nowhere mentioned, nor is the re-marriage of widows prescribed in the
>> rules concerning marriage.
>>
>> This practice which is reprehended by the learned of the twice-born
>> castes as fit for cattle is said (to have occurred) even among men, while
>> Vena ruled.
>>
>> That chief of royal sages who formerly possessed the whole world, caused
>> a confusion of the castes (varna), his intellect being destroyed by lust.
>>
>> Since that (time) the virtuous censure that (man) who in his folly
>> appoints a woman, whose husband died, to (bear) children (to another man).
>>
>> A practice prevalent in ancient times which permitted a childless widow
>> to have intercourse with the brother or any near kinsman of her deceased
>> husband to raise up issue to him, the son so born being called क्षेत्रज 
>> (kṣetraja);
>> cf. Manusmṛti 9.59.:-देवराद्वा सपिण्डाद्वा स्त्रिया सम्यङ् नियुक्तया ।
>> प्रजे- प्सिताधिगन्तव्या सन्तानस्य परिक्षये (devarādvā sapiṇḍādvā striyā
>> samyaṅ niyuktayā | praje- psitādhigantavyā santānasya parikṣaye) ||; see 6,
>> 65 also. (Vyāsa begot pāṇḍu and dhṛtarāṣṭra on the widows of vicitravīrya
>> in this way).
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> YAGNAVALKYA SMRITHI
>>
>> by Kalita Nabanita
>>
>> Hinduism Dharmashastra
>>
>> Chapter 3.6b - The practice of Niyoga
>>
>> Chapter 3 - The Social Aspect Depicted in the Vyavahārādhyāya
>>
>> Niyoga is an age-old social practice, which has become obsolete in modern
>> age. This practice of ancient Hindu Law resembles the Levirate of the
>> Jewish Law.
>>
>> The writers of the Dharmaśāstras are not unanimous about the fact,
>> whether it is to be allowed or not. Manu censures niyoga vehemently and
>> calls it a beastly practice (paśudharma). He declares that niyoga cannot
>> take place in case of widow of a twice-born and is said to be in vogue only
>> in the reign of king Veṇa
>>
>>  nānyasminvidhavā nārī niyoktavyā dvijātibhiḥ anyasinhi niyuñjānā dharmaṃ
>> hanyuḥ sanātanam// ayaṃ dvijairvidvadbhiḥ paśudharmo vigarhitaḥ//
>> manuṣyāṇāmapi prokto vene rājyaṃ praśāsati// Manusmṛti, 9.64-68
>>
>> However, immediately before prohibiting this practice, he lays down all
>> the process to be observed in niyoga.
>>
>>  Further, the Manusmṛti declares the process niyoga, with a comparison of
>> the woman to field, husband to owner of field, the person, who is allowed
>> to procreate child with another’s wife to owner of seed, and the child
>> begotten in such union to crop. Thereby, it propounds the rule of niyoga
>> that in presence of a special contract between the owner of the field and
>> the owner of the seed, both are considered sharers of the crops, otherwise
>> the owner of field receives the crops.
>>
>>  He expressly permits niyoga in particular case of a bride, whose future
>> husband dies before marriage.
>>
>> yasyā mriyeta kanyā yā vācā satye kṛte patiḥ// tāmanena vidhānena nijo
>> vindeta devaraḥ// Ibid., 9.69
>>
>> Moreover, Manu gives the rule of partition concerning the son born as a
>> result of niyoga.Considering the above-mentioned account, Julius Jolly is
>> of the opinion that Manu’s view regarding niyoga is contradictory.
>>
>> Robert Lingat holds that though Manu condemns niyoga and such other
>> practices yet he might have confronted with the customs for prohibition to
>> be efficacious.
>>
>>  However, the reconciliation of this provision, may suggest its
>> acceptance for the widows of the Śūdras, excluding three upper castes.
>>
>> The practice of niyoga does not seem to be referred in terms of
>> disapproval by Yājñavalkya. In fact, the texts of the Vyavahārādhyāya
>> suggest that the son born of such a practice occupies a good position.
>> Yājñavalkya declares that a son begotten by a sonless person on the soil of
>> another man through legal appointment is lawful heir and can offer funeral
>> cakes for both.
>>
>> aputreṇa parakṣetre niyogotpāditaḥ sutaḥ/ ubhayorapyasau rikthī piṇḍadātā
>> ca dharmataḥ// Yājñavalkyasmṛti, 2.127
>>
>> Thus, the practice of niyoga is legally recognised by Yājñavalkya. It is
>> described under the Ācārādhyāya in the following words-in case of a younger
>> brother of the husband, in his absence a sapiṇḍa, in his absence a sagotra,
>> with the permission of elders, having his body rubbed with clarified
>> butter, cohabits with a sonless woman in seasons, till she conceives, then
>> the son born by this procedure is known as Kṣetraja. He who does not act
>> according to the procedure will be condemned.
>>
>>  It is already shown in the table furnished in this chapter, displaying
>> the places of different kinds of son that in the Yājñavalkyasmṛti, the
>> Kṣetraja son is placed in third rank after the Aurasa and Putrikāputra. The
>> legal affiliation to such son is also distinct when the author states that
>> the sons born of legally wedded marriage or through the process of niyoga,
>> being free from defect, are entitled to inherit the property of their
>> father, who cannot inherit due to some defects.
>>
>> aurasāḥ kṣetrajāstveṣāṃ nirdoṣā bhāgahāriṇaḥ/ Ibid., 2.141
>>
>> Thus, it appears that during the time of the Yājñavalkyasmṛti, niyoga is
>> favoured in the society, as the text gives legal sanction to a son born of
>> such practice, which may have occurred with changing times and prevailing
>> customs.
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Niyoga (inviting a widow to remarry)
>>
>> Chapter 5 - Cultural history in the Matsya-Purāṇa
>>
>> When it comes to society and marriage, it remains incomplete without
>> talking about a particular issue, that is Niyoga . The practice of inviting
>> a widow to remarry or have children was called Niyoga . However, this
>> method was not considered sacred by everyone. For example, even though sage
>> Gautama recognized it, but according to Āpastamba, it was completely
>> forbidden. Almost the entire part of the Mahābhārata is filled by this
>> Niyoga method.
>>
>> There were several rules for this Niyoga. For example–
>>
>> (1) The person whose wife will be Niyoga , whether he is dead or alive,
>> must be childless,
>>
>> (2) The family guru will decide who will be appointed for the Niyoga ,
>>
>> (3) The person to be appointed should be the husband’s brother or his
>> clan, caste and pravara should be equal,
>>
>> (4) This method should be done out of a sense of duty, not if it is a
>> desired object,
>>
>> (5) The person to be appointed must be anointed with ghee (Butter) or
>> oil, not by words, kisses or playing tricks,
>>
>> (6) This relationship will last only until one or two children are born,
>>
>> (7) The widow must be young and healthy enough,
>>
>> (8) After birth, the widow and the appointed person will consider each
>> other as father-in-law and daughter-in-law.
>>
>> In the Mahābhārata , Satyavati hire her stepson Bhīṣma to niyoga after
>> the death of her own son Vicitravīrya but Bhīṣma refuses. Then Satyavati’s
>> pre-marital son Kṛṣṇa Dvaipāyana Vedavyāsa was invited for Niyoga with the
>> two widows of Vicitravīrya. From whom were born Dhṛtarāṣṭra and Pāndu and
>> from a maid Vidura. There are also several examples of Niyoga in the
>> MatsyaPurāṇa .
>>
>> (I) verse 46 and 47 of the fiftieth chapter of Matsya Purāṇa contain the
>> story of the birth of Dhṛtarāṣṭra, Pāndu and Vidura from the wive of
>> Vicitravīrya.
>>
>> (II) Mahārāja Bāli’s wife Sudeṣṇāand sage Dīrghatamā’s Niyoga resulted as
>> Bali’s five Kṣetraja sons named–Anga, Vanga, Suhya, Pundra and Kaliṅga.[1]
>>
>> (III) King Pāndu also had five Kṣetraja sons. From Dharmarāja, Kunti gave
>> birth Yudhiṣṭhira, from Vāyu, Bhīma, and from Indra, Arjuna. From
>> Aśvinīkumar’s, Mādrī gave birth to two sons Nakula and Sahadeva. The five
>> were called Devadatta as they were born from Deva (Gods).[2]
>>
>> The study of social structure is very important in the study of society
>> and culture. Social structure refers to the system with which the order of
>> the whole part of society is related so that the elements of social life
>> are connected together. These relationships are built one after the other.
>> They can also be called a sequence of various complications. So the social
>> structure is nothing more than a complete coordinator of social relations
>> (Radcliffe brown A.R., Structure and function in primitive society, Ch. X
>> pp 188ff). The study of social structure enables one to know how the
>> various units of society who have direct or indirect contact with each
>> other interact with each other in social life.
>>
>> Matsya Purāṇa–Chapter 48/24, 25
>>
>> Matsya Purāṇa–Chapter 50/48, 49, 50
>>
>> End of part 1  KR IRS 14724 15724
>>
>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> --
>> On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust
>>
>> We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join
>>
>> Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup
>>
>> Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust
>>
>> Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions:
>> https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "KeralaIyers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZoqAGpGRzDgaOwZTiiexWaDdPPNijC2D9yY%2BJQvMxXvSCQ%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZoqAGpGRzDgaOwZTiiexWaDdPPNijC2D9yY%2BJQvMxXvSCQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust
>
> We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join
>
> Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup
>
> Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust
>
> Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions:
> https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "KeralaIyers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL4idhOCSuNtuO%2B92DGwRCT1otAYPD5qJRt41Ph2MFnOgM2Eng%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL4idhOCSuNtuO%2B92DGwRCT1otAYPD5qJRt41Ph2MFnOgM2Eng%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZor1YLL8u%3DRH_z8J_8zm_WDWSVjHBouhXSQyOXPpD1X8Jg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to