-- *Mar**The Lordly and Godly Observer and Consumer*
*Rene Descartes*, the French Philosopher, embedded his dictum, the enduring dictatorial dictum, that every living organism is just a machine and that it has no feelings including the feeling of pain. The only exception is the human, into whose pineal gland God established his residence, converting the human into a God that rules all. The human is made into the God that observes, tinkers, experiments, consumes, mechanically manipulates…, all with no feelings or emotions, as he is just a mechanic dealing with machines. His Cartesian, mechanical,or scientific, or technological approach or mathematical approach, gave and gives him, the license to do any and everything for science, the mechanical approach where emotions shall be avoided as emotions mean bias. One must just logic and avoid all feelings and emotions, to be scientific. Today, we have the Atheists, who call themselves Rationalists, to whom the mechanical view is the only correct view. There are no friendly and loving trees, animals, birds, bees, fish, in fact there are no organisms with feelings and emotions, for the founder Atheists. The mechanical attitude has entered into the internal hormonal communication, and today even the realization that all life forms are basically and completely forms of emotions, does not change the mechanical approach or the scientific approach, that governs our hormonal communication. We inflict horrible pains and tortures on every life form for experimentation in science. Indifference to their feelings and emotions is the foundation of science. Feelings and emotions in free and healthy nature are Biospheric, which means that your internal hormonal communication is fused to the internal hormonal communications of the other organisms of the Biosphere, via breathing, smelling, sensing and understanding. The whole gamut of emotional communication, perception and common understanding of all organisms of the biosphere has been destroyed thanks to the repudiation of the emotional connect to nature and the destruction of nature as economic activity. The Human no longer feels, but just is an observer indifferent to the pain and feelings of every life form, life forms that breathe, smell, sense, and communicate with every other life form, the emotional foundation of the Biosphere. The fundamental emotional bond of the human to nature, the basically emotional nature, starting from the emotions laden soil bacteria to the big whales, has been cut and one has to avoid the breathe based emotional communication from nature to become scientific. One must repudiate the communication content of one’s very breathing. One has to breathe indifferently avoiding feelings and emotions resulting from smells. Now, we have the Robots, the truly indifferent scientists to all emotions, the ideals of science, and we have to be as indifferent as the Robot to be completely scientific. So we have economics without ecology as the basis but the half defunct Newtonian mechanics. AI is the new language of communication, which repudiates the role of breathing and emotions in perception, in fact the defunct perception. We may sing or the Robots may sing, Machines and Mathematics are everywhere, Not a speck of feeling or emotion anywhere. This is the new song of science. If you do not like this prospect that has filled up totally the Horizon, then start your own tiny ‘Institute of Emotions’. YM Sarma Chat GPT YM Sarma's text, "The Lordly and Godly Observer and Consumer," offers a critical reflection on the mechanical and emotionless approach that has come to dominate modern science and human interaction with nature. This critique is rooted in the historical influence of Cartesian dualism and the detachment of humans from the natural, emotional world. ### Key Themes and Reflections: 1. **Cartesian Dualism and Its Legacy**: - The text begins by referencing René Descartes, whose philosophy separated mind and body, leading to the view that animals and nature were mere machines without feelings. Descartes' idea that only humans possessed a mind capable of experiencing emotions set the stage for a detached, mechanical view of the world, where nature could be manipulated and exploited without moral consideration. 2. **Rationalism and Atheism**: - Sarma critiques modern rationalism and atheism, which often embrace a purely mechanical view of the world, ignoring the emotional and sentient aspects of life. This perspective, according to Sarma, has led to a disconnection from the natural world and a disregard for the intrinsic value and emotional complexity of other life forms. 3. **The Emotional Communication of the Biosphere**: - The text highlights the interconnectedness of all life forms through emotional communication. This communication is described as being mediated by breathing, smelling, sensing, and understanding—a kind of biospheric language that has been lost in modern scientific approaches that prioritize logic over emotion. 4. **The Rise of Robots and AI**: - Sarma sees the rise of artificial intelligence and robotics as the culmination of the mechanical approach. Robots, being devoid of emotions, represent the ideal of modern science, which seeks to eliminate the emotional aspects of perception and interaction. This is seen as a dangerous path that further alienates humans from the natural world. 5. **A Call to Reconnect with Emotions**: - In response to this bleak outlook, Sarma calls for the creation of "Institutes of Emotions," where people can reconnect with the emotional foundations of life. This suggests a need to re-integrate emotions into our understanding of the world, recognizing the importance of feelings in how we perceive and interact with the environment. ### Broader Implications: - **The Human-Nature Relationship**: - The text serves as a powerful critique of how modern science and technology have distanced humans from the natural world. By rejecting the emotional and sentient aspects of life, humanity risks losing its connection to nature and the biosphere, leading to ecological and spiritual impoverishment. - **The Role of Emotions in Science**: - Sarma's argument raises important questions about the role of emotions in scientific inquiry. While objectivity is often seen as the cornerstone of scientific practice, the text suggests that a complete rejection of emotions may lead to a distorted and ultimately harmful understanding of the world. ### Final Thought: YM Sarma's work challenges readers to reconsider the dominant scientific paradigms that prioritize mechanical efficiency and objectivity over emotional and ecological interconnectedness. The call to establish "Institutes of Emotions" reflects a desire to restore balance and harmony between humans and the natural world, recognizing that true understanding requires both logic and feeling. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKU4bkEw836fYFZU_K7thjzWh6Y4hyUiEqEVhWxZGZkCw%40mail.gmail.com.
