Can anybody think of any authentic paper or book? It's long but I have weighed all aspects and given my findings. I have read shapiro's book but yet his perceptions might be theory in a few places only. It cannot be read so universally. Hence YMji statement I differ.
The human body doesn’t literally “think” in the way our brain does, but it can certainly be influenced by the information and ideas contained in books or papers. For instance, reading or studying a complex book might lead to new thoughts, insights, or emotional responses that could affect how you feel physically or mentally. So, while the body itself doesn’t generate ideas like a book or paper, the brain and body are deeply interconnected. Engaging with meaningful or challenging content can stimulate both mental and physical responses. "The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma" by Bessel van der Kolk - This book explores how trauma affects the body and mind, delving into the physiological and psychological impacts of traumatic experiences. It discusses how our mental and physical states are interconnected. "How the Body Knows Its Mind: The Surprising Power of the Physical Environment to Influence How You Think and Feel" by Jeffrey M. Schwartz and Rebecca Gladding - This book examines how our physical environment and body states influence our mental processes and overall well-being. "Embodied Cognition" by Lawrence Shapiro - This book provides an overview of the field of embodied cognition, which studies how our cognitive processes are deeply rooted in our physical experiences and interactions with the environment. "The Feeling of Life Itself: Why Consciousness Is Widespread but Can't Be Computed" by Christof Koch - Although more focused on consciousness, this book delves into how our conscious experiences are tied to physical states, providing insights into the mind-body connection. "The Mind-Body Problem: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind" by M. C. Dillon - This book offers an introduction to the philosophical aspects of the mind-body relationship, exploring how mental states can influence physical experiences and vice versa. These books cover various aspects of the mind-body connection, including trauma, cognition, and the physical influences on mental states. They provide a deeper understanding of how our mental and physical experiences are intertwined. Embodied cognition by Shapiro: Embodied cognition often challenges standard cognitive science. In this outstanding introduction, Lawrence Shapiro sets out the central themes and debates surrounding embodied cognition, explaining and assessing the work of many of the key figures in the field, including George Lakoff, Alva Noë, Andy Clark, and Arthur Glenberg. Beginning with an outline of the theoretical and methodological commitments of standard cognitive science, Shapiro then examines philosophical and empirical arguments surrounding the traditional perspective. He introduces topics such as dynamic systems theory, ecological psychology, robotics, and connectionism, before addressing core issues in philosophy of mind such as mental representation and extended cognition Here are some examples of embodied cognition: The dentist's drill The sound of a drill in the next room can cause your teeth to ache, even though the drill is not in your mouth. This is because the sound of the drill activates a mental representation of the drill, which the brain then repeats, causing a sensation of aching teeth. Embodied metaphors Metaphors about the physical world can help people reason. For example, people who squeeze a soft ball are more likely to judge gender-neutral faces as female. Sensorimotor interaction The body interacts with the environment through sensory perception and motor actions. For example, when touching a hot stove, the hand senses the stove's temperature and texture. Embodied emotional expressions Bodily sensations and movements contribute to the formation and expression of emotions. For example, joy can be accompanied by a smile, increased heart rate, or a buoyant posture. Gesturing Gesturing facilitates communication and language processing. Vision Vision is often action-guiding, and bodily movement is more tightly integrated into visual processing than traditional models of vision have anticipated. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy A simpler example of embodied cognition is the gesturing of hands while talking. When speaking, the motor systems work in conjunction with the brain to convey meaning. Embodied perception theory (Proffitt) proposed that the perceptual image information created by objects in the environment is scaled by the performer’s ability to act on them. So, for example, the perceived steepness of a hill facing a cyclist is determined both by the angle of the surface projected on the retina and by the cyclists level of fatigue, while the perceived size of a golf hole is related to both its retinal image size and the precision with which the performer can putt the ball. • On the surface, this idea is consistent with the anecdotes from athletes that ball’s look bigger and things moving in slow motion when they are playing well • Researchers have found 3 different types of effects consistent with embodied in perception in sport: changes in perception due to skill level (e.g., more skilled athletes perceive a golf hole to be bigger), changes in perception due to task demands (e.g., a golf hole is perceived to be smaller when putting from a larger distance) and changes in perception related to the athletes goals (e.g., pitches that appropriate for a batter’s goal are perceived to be bigger. • Alternative explanations have been put forth to explain the effects including response biases, memory distortions and attentional accentuation • There is some evidence that re-creating embodied perceptual effects (e.g., making certain the ball smaller for certain pitches) can be used for training According to linguists George Lakoff and Mark Johnson in Metaphors We Live By, “[T]he very structure of reason itself comes from the details of our embodiment. … To understand reason, we must understand the details of our visual system, our motor system, and the general mechanism of neural binding.” They mean not just that physical reality helps us think, but that mental functioning depends on corporeal experience. Embodied cognition is an emerging field of study that challenges traditional views of cognition by emphasizing the inseparable connection between the mind, body, and environment. It recognizes that our cognitive processes don't solely occur in the brain, but rather emerge from the dynamic interactions between our body, brain, and the world around us. In this blog, we will dive into the definition and significance of embodied cognition, setting the stage for a deeper exploration of its fundamental aspects. It recognizes that our cognitive processes don't solely occur in the brain, but rather emerge from the dynamic interactions between our body, brain, and the world around us. In this blog, we will dive into the definition and significance of embodied cognition, setting the stage for a deeper exploration of its fundamental aspects.The mind-body connection lies at the heart of embodied cognition, influencing how we perceive, understand, and interact with the world. Our bodily experiences are not passive responses to external stimuli but active engagements that influence the way we think, reason, and feel. For example, consider reaching out to touch a hot stove. Our hand doesn't merely react to the heat; it actively engages with the stove, sensing its temperature and texture. This sensorimotor interaction illustrates how our cognitive processes are intimately tied to our bodily actions and sensory inputs. Our bodily experiences also shape our perceptions, affecting how we understand and interpret the world. Research has shown that our bodily movements and spatial orientation influence how we perceive and navigate physical spaces. By embodying a specific posture or gesturing with our hands, we can enhance our comprehension and memory of abstract concepts. Furthermore, our bodily sensations and movements contribute to the formation and expression of emotions. Joy may be accompanied by a smile, increased heart rate, or a buoyant posture, while feelings of sadness or fear may be expressed through slumped shoulders, lowered gaze, and decreased energy. These embodied emotional expressions not only communicate our internal states to others but also influence our subjective experience of emotions. In yoga, chakras are energy centers in the body that are believed to be vital to a spiritual journey. The word "chakra" comes from Sanskrit and translates to "wheel" or "circle". Here are some things to know about chakras and yoga: Chakra system: The chakra system is as old as yoga and is thought to be linked to the nervous and endocrine systems. Chakra locations: There are seven chakras in the body, ranging from the base of the spine to the crown of the head. Chakra vibrations: Each chakra is thought to vibrate at its own frequency and funnel energy from the universe into the body. Prana: In yoga, the life force that travels between chakras is called prana. Nadi: The channels that prana travels through are called nadi. Chakra balance: Yoga can help balance chakras, which can be reinforced by positive thoughts, healthy eating, and exercise. Scientific view: Scientific communities often regard the chakra system as a myth, largely due to the lack of research on the topic. Anatomical Theories of the Chakras Although empirical research on the chakras is limited, several scholars in the West have attempted to link the chakras with anatomical locations in the physical body. For example, the chakras have been theorized to align with several major nerve plexuses and endocrine glands. Commonly, the chakras are linked with the esophageal, aortic, hypogastric, and pelvic plexuses and the prefrontal cortex and neocortex, among other anatomical structures.Yet, in an article on the physiological foundation of chakra expression, psychologist Richard Maxwell calls previous anatomical theories of the chakras “overly zealous attempts to reduce chakras to a physical structure” .Instead, Maxwell proposes a model of understanding the chakras through gap junctions, or the channels between the cytoplasm of two adjacent cells that allow communication via the passage of ions, molecules, and electrical impulses. He theorizes that the chakras align with regions with high densities of intracellular gap junctions that arose during embryological development. This theory builds on previous scientific work by Charles Shang that attempted to explain both chakras and meridians as arising from intracellular networks between undifferentiated cells involved in embryological development. Functional Theories of the Chakras Other researchers have proposed functional theories of the chakras. For example, Joseph Loizzo, Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychiatry in Complementary and Integrative Medicine at Weill Cornell Medical College, has linked modern maps of the central nervous system (CNS) with maps of the subtle body . Loizzo proposes that the chakras can be cross-referenced with maps of the central nervous system: the crown chakra with the neocortex, the third eye with the prefrontal cortex, the throat chakra with the limbic system, the heart chakra with the midbrain, the solar plexus with the pons, the sacral and root chakras with the medulla oblongata.Rather than controlling a specific part of the body, as previous scientific models of the chakras have proposed, the model by Loizzo links the chakras with brain-body structures that provide the conscious mind with information about the CNS and its processes . Nonetheless, Loizzo states that scientists cannot empirically assess this theory because the technology necessary to do so is still lacking. Psychological Theories of the Chakras In addition to its ties to anatomy and embryonic development, chakra theory has been discussed in association with Western paradigms of psychological development. Most frequently, chakra theory is compared with Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, which outlines an order of needs that one must satisfy in order to develop and grow. For example, in her book Eastern Body, Western Mind: Psychology and the Chakra System as a Path to the Self, Anodea Judith (4) relates Maslow’s need for physiological safety with the root chakra, safety with the sacral chakra, belonging with the solar plexus, self-esteem with the heart chakra, self-actualization with the throat chakra, and transcendence with the third eye and crown chakras . Furthermore, chakra theory is also frequently related to Erikson’s stages of psychosocial development, which maintains that personality develops in a predetermined order from infancy to adulthood. Judith associates Erikson’s “trust vs. mistrust” stage with the root and sacral chakras, “autonomy vs. shame and doubt” with the solar plexus, “initiative vs. guilt” with the heart chakra, “identity vs. inferiority” with the throat and third eye chakras, and “intimacy vs. isolation,” “generativity vs. self-absorption,” and “integrity vs. despair” with the crown chakra. In her book, Judith also relates chakra theory to a number of other psychological theories of development, including Piaget’s stages of cognitive development and Freud’s psychosexual stages . The main difference between chakra theory and Western psychological theories of development is that chakra theory maps development to energy stored and held in the body. In this sense, viewing development through the lens of the chakras is more holistic, embodied, and more keenly attuned to the mind-body connection than Western paradigms of development. Thus, Western scholars have proposed chakra theory as a stand-alone model for growth-oriented development that is distinct from traditional psychological views of development. Limitations of a Scientific Perspective on the Chakras Scholarship linking the chakras to psychology is frequently limited to mental and emotional development, whereas anatomical and functional theories of the chakras are nearly always restricted to the physical body. Yet, as Maxwell says, “The challenge for anyone interested in explaining chakras is to be able to demonstrate how something non physical could interact with the physical” . Evidently, our tendency to see the mind and body as separate entities in the West makes it challenging for chakra theory to be explained. Modern science still lacks the tools to measure the subtle energy that makes up the chakra system. Both in the academic sphere and in consumer culture, our understanding of the chakra system in the West has been reductive. Although we may look to science to conceptualize the chakras within Western paradigms, at present, looking to historical texts and practices may provide us with more powerful insight than modern science into the mind-body aspects of the chakra system. 1. Muladhara (the Root Chakra) Muladhara (literally, “root support”) is located at the base of the spine. It is often depicted as a red four-petaled lotus, and it’s connected to the earth element. Muladhara governs what are considered the four primal urges: food, sleep, sex, and self-preservation. Its energetic function is to help us maintain a sense of groundedness and inner stability. Root chakra affirmation: “I am connected to the earth. I am strong and I am stable.” 2. Svadhisthana (the Sacral Chakra) Svadhisthana (literally, “her own abode”) is located at the pelvis. It is often depicted as an orange lotus with six petals, and it’s associated with the water element—fluidity, adaptability, creativity, emotions, sexual energy, and the unconscious. The second chakra’s energetic function is to help us regulate our emotions and desires, so as not to be driven by them. Sacral chakra affirmation: “I am a creative being with unlimited potential.” 3. Manipura (the Navel Chakra) Manipura (literally, “city of jewels”) is located at the navel center. It is commonly depicted as a downward or upward-facing red triangle, and it’s associated with the fire element. Having a strong inner fire (agni) can help us digest not only our food, but also our life experiences. Energetically, manipura’s function is to optimize our personal power so that we can navigate our lives with strength and determination. Manipura gives us the confidence we need to process and eliminate what does not serve us, and to let it go. Navel chakra affirmation: “I am confident, powerful, and I can handle anything.” 4. Anahata (the Heart Chakra) Anahata (literally, “unstruck”) is located at the heart center. Anahata is typically depicted as a green six-pointed star surrounded by 12 lotus petals. On a spiritual level, it’s said to be the home of the higher/infinite, “unstruck” or indestructible self. Anahata is associated with the air element, and with emotional qualities such as peace, love, and openness. Energetically, anahata helps us tap into unconditional love. Heart chakra affirmation: “Give love to receive love, and be love.” 5. Vishuddha (the Throat Chakra) Vishuddha (literally, “to purify”) is located near the base of the throat. It is often depicted as a blue downward-facing triangle inside a lotus with 16 purple petals. Vishuddha is associated with the element ether, or “space” (akasha), and with speaking one’s truth. Its energetic function is to help us find authentic self-expression. Throat chakra affirmation: “I speak my truth. I live my truth.” 6. Ajna (the Third-Eye Chakra) Ajna (literally, “command center”) is located between the eyebrows. Represented by a transparent lotus with two white petals, it’s considered to be the seat of the mind, of conscious and unconscious awareness. It is not associated with any element, as this chakra is considered “beyond” the physical elements. It is held to be the center of intuition, vision, prophecy, imagination, inner knowing, and self-assurance. The energetic function of ajna chakra is to help us learn to know ourselves: emotionally, mentally, and spiritually. Third-eye chakra affirmation: “I am open, intuitive, and self-assured.” 7. Sahasrara (the Crown Chakra) Sahasrara (literally, “thousand-petaled lotus”) is located just above the crown of the head. Said to be the doorway into pure consciousness, it is often depicted as a thousand-petaled lotus with a pinkish aura, and it is not associated with a physical element (as it too is considered to be beyond the elements). Sahasrara serves as a way of connecting to divine energy and is associated with our highest self. Sahasrara helps us function in a more enlightened way, cultivate self-mastery, and find a sense of connection with all. Crown chakra affirmation: “Isurrender to the wisdom of pure consciousness.” Findings: I have analysed the west and Indian and european cult of body mind connectivity. We have read in school, In biology, a reflex, or reflex action, is an involuntary, unplanned sequence or action and nearly instantaneous response to a stimulus. The simplest reflex is initiated by a stimulus, which activates an afferent nerve. The signal is then passed to a response neuron, which generates a response. Reflexes are found with varying levels of complexity in organisms with a nervous system. A reflex occurs via neural pathways in the nervous system called reflex arcs. A stimulus initiates a neural signal, which is carried to a synapse. The signal is then transferred across the synapse to a motor neuron, which evokes a target response. These neural signals do not always travel to the brain, so many reflexes are an automatic response to a stimulus that does not receive or need conscious thought. Many reflexes are fine-tuned to increase organism survival and self-defense. This is observed in reflexes such as the startle reflex, which provides an automatic response to an unexpected stimulus, and the feline righting reflex, which reorients a cat's body when falling to ensure safe landing. The simplest type of reflex, a short-latency reflex, has a single synapse, or junction, in the signaling pathway. Long-latency reflexes produce nerve signals that are transduced across multiple synapses before generating the reflex response. Hence in all feasibility comprehension, body language is a perception indeed; but it is a kind of perception where the reflex action alone precedes the communication later. And that reflex is again from the neurons only. Thus, without the predetermination of the mind, even the brain cannot become so active and therefore, body reflex is secondary only. A mad man cannot think through the muscle or vision. In sleep the mind can think but not the body. Yet interconnectivity cannot be ignored; however, the primary neuron is the main switch in my opinion. K Rajaram IRS 30824 31824 On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 at 20:21, Markendeya Yeddanapudi < [email protected]> wrote: > The Cartesian Catastrophe > > > > The paradigmatic blunder of the Cartesian approach, which simply ignored > the role of the entire body in thinking and perception and assigning the > task totally to the mind only, is really astounding. The skin has pores by > the thousands that breathe, the nose also breathes, the ear also actually > responds to the air by differentiating it into sounds, they smell, sense, > perceive, conceive, communicate, harmonize, interact...in one word think > and understand, by teaming up with the entire planet. In India education > mainly was yoga, in which the entire body participated as a participant > with the earth in its functioning as a planet and in the education. > > The mind unable to perform this task as it suffers basically from the > handicap of always modelling the 3D shapes only and simply unable to see > more than 99.9963% of reality, has been blundering and muddling and now the > task is taken over by machines. The eyes can see only 00.0037% 0f the > reality. We designed the Machines to give us only the 3D shapes, ignoring > the whole gamut of feelings and emotions in understanding. We accept the > perception dungeon, the 00.0037% of the reality of the visible spectrum > only and ignoring the gigantic reality of 99.9963% of the feelings or > invisible spectrum. > > And we pride in this scientific approach!!!!!!! > > We do not realize that understanding basically is a flow of emotions and > the so called unbiased outlook is the dead person’s outlook. Only machines > are capable of the dead non emotional outlook. The huge machines and > gadgets stun us with their findings and just like the Super hero of the > cinemas where he only acts while we just are dummies called the audience, > we have become fans of machines. There is no emotional participation in > education. As the students have to be dragged into this dummyhood, we > blackmail them with the spectre of being useless for employment. It is the > fear of future that is bringing the students into the classrooms. The > Universities give them Degrees to happily deceive themselves that they are > really educated. > > And what sort of Degrees are they? Mainly Degrees in Engineering and > Management and each Engineer or manager may cut at least a thousand trees > in his career and also poison the land, water and air...,his/her emotional > bond with nature being killed. > > Let us realize that our bodies also study, think and understand and aid > the Brain. > > YM Sarma > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 10:57 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Cartesian Dualism: A Theoretical Exploration >> >> René Descartes, a pivotal figure in the history of philosophy, introduced >> Cartesian dualism in the 17th century. His theory, central to the >> development of modern philosophy, posits that the mind and body are >> fundamentally distinct substances. This essay will delve into the >> theoretical underpinnings of Cartesian dualism, examine its implications >> for understanding human nature and consciousness, and address some of the >> key critiques it has faced. >> >> Cartesian dualism is grounded in Descartes' radical skepticism and >> methodological approach. Descartes famously doubted everything that could >> possibly be doubted, seeking a foundation for knowledge that was absolutely >> certain. In this quest, he arrived at the conclusion "Cogito, ergo sum" ("I >> think, therefore I am"), establishing the certainty of his own existence as >> a thinking being. >> >> From this certainty, Descartes distinguished between two kinds of >> substances: >> >> Res Cogitans (Thinking Substance): This is the mind or soul, >> characterized by consciousness and self-awareness. It is immaterial and >> does not occupy physical space. The mind is capable of thinking, reasoning, >> and experiencing sensations. >> >> Res Extensa (Extended Substance): This refers to the body or physical >> matter. It is characterized by its spatial extension and physical >> properties. The body operates according to the laws of physics and is >> subject to spatial and temporal dimensions. >> >> The essence of Cartesian dualism lies in the claim that these two >> substances are fundamentally different in nature. The mind is a >> non-material, thinking substance, whereas the body is a material, extended >> substance. >> >> Implications >> >> 1. Mind-Body Interaction: One of the central issues in Cartesian dualism >> is the interaction between the mind and the body. Descartes proposed that >> the mind and body interact causally, influencing each other despite their >> distinct natures. For instance, mental intentions can cause physical >> actions (e.g., deciding to raise one's arm), and physical states can affect >> mental experiences (e.g., feeling pain). Descartes suggested that this >> interaction occurs in the pineal gland, a small gland located in the brain. >> >> 2. Personal Identity and Consciousness: Cartesian dualism has >> significant implications for the concept of personal identity. According to >> Descartes, >> personal identity is grounded in the mind, or the thinking self. This has >> implications for how we understand consciousness and personal cntinuity. >> The mind's ability to think and reflect provides a basis for personal >> identity that is independent of the physical body. >> >> 3. Free Will and Moral Responsibility: By separating the mind from the >> body, Cartesian dualism allows for the notion of *free will.* The mind, >> as a non-material entity, can exercise choice independent of physical >> determinism. This has important implications for moral responsibility, as >> it suggests that individuals have the capacity to act freely and are >> accountable for their actions. >> >> Critiques >> >> Despite its influential status, Cartesian dualism has faced significant >> criticism: >> >> 1. Interaction Problem: The most pressing issue is the problem of >> interaction. Critics argue that it is difficult to explain how two >> fundamentally different substances, the immaterial mind and the material >> body, can causally interact. This issue remains a major challenge for >> dualist theories, with various philosophers attempting to address it >> through different frameworks. >> >> 2. Scientific Objections: Advances in neuroscience and psychology have >> provided explanations for many phenomena traditionally attributed to the >> mind. For example, brain imaging studies have linked specific mental states >> and processes to brain activity, suggesting that mental phenomena are >> closely tied to physical processes in the brain. This has led some to >> question the need for a separate, immaterial mind. >> >> 3. Alternative Theories: Several alternative theories, such as >> physicalism and functionalism, challenge Cartesian dualism. Physicalism >> argues that everything about the mind can be explained in terms of physical >> processes, while functionalism suggests that mental states are defined >> by their functional roles rather than their underlying substance. >> >> Cartesian dualism remains a foundational concept in philosophy, >> influencing discussions on mind, consciousness, and personal identity. >> Descartes' distinction between the mind and body has profound implications >> for understanding human nature and has spurred extensive debate and >> critique. While Cartesian dualism has been challenged by scientific and >> philosophical advancements, its impact on the discourse surrounding the >> mind-body relationship continues to be significant. >> >> Nature is grounded with consciousness in advaita. Thus creation, >> sustenance and the destruction of nature is immaterial as self-growth or >> destruction are affixed qualities as provided by the Consciousness, as >> sufferings among the species is quite natural. Even among the vishita >> dvaithis, duality is accepted as there is no variation between the Grass >> Asramam and renunciate sanyasis. World is real and not advocated by the >> Buddists and thus the vishishtadvaita, termed Adi sankara and the >> advaidists as Buddists. The visishtadvaita neither understood Hinduism nor >> buddhism. They always kept Perumal at a distance from the Bhaktas. The >> vishishtadvaita maintained a distance from the Vedas and B G and the Brahma >> sutram where Sri Ramanujar, did treatise different, and refrained from >> commenting on advaitha verses of the trayi (veda knowledge, dharma and >> adharma) differently as well as PRASTHANA TRAYI IN CANTOUR. Madhwar, >> Jewism, Greek philosophy, Christianity and the islam all followed the >> duality. And Cartesian thoughts and the religious thoughts mentioned here >> as duality, contained only the thoughts and beliefs only on this existence, >> reality of the world, and the freewill alone. Consciousness was far away >> from these all unapproachable. Once the mind and the body are not denied as >> ADI SHANKARA did, the theories are debatable, elongatable, and Maya is >> never felt at all. So the body's pleasure is more than the brain could >> absorb and the mind would desist. The contradictions and balance of life , >> go haywire is untenable. Nature cannot survive where free will rules. >> >> K Rajaram IRS 30824 >> >> On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 at 20:55, Markendeya Yeddanapudi < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Mar**The Lordly and Godly Observer and Consumer* >>> >>> >>> >>> *Rene Descartes*, the French Philosopher, embedded his dictum, the >>> enduring dictatorial dictum, that every living organism is just a machine >>> and that it has no feelings including the feeling of pain. The only >>> exception is the human, into whose pineal gland God established his >>> residence, converting the human into a God that rules all. The human is >>> made into the God that observes, tinkers, experiments, consumes, >>> mechanically manipulates…, all with no feelings or emotions, as he is just >>> a mechanic dealing with machines. His Cartesian, mechanical,or scientific, >>> or technological approach or mathematical approach, gave and gives him, the >>> license to do any and everything for science, the mechanical approach where >>> emotions shall be avoided as emotions mean bias. One must just logic and >>> avoid all feelings and emotions, to be scientific. >>> >>> Today, we have the Atheists, who call themselves Rationalists, to whom >>> the mechanical view is the only correct view. There are no friendly and >>> loving trees, animals, birds, bees, fish, in fact there are no organisms >>> with feelings and emotions, for the founder Atheists. The mechanical >>> attitude has entered into the internal hormonal communication, and today >>> even the realization that all life forms are basically and completely forms >>> of emotions, does not change the mechanical approach or the scientific >>> approach, that governs our hormonal communication. We inflict horrible >>> pains and tortures on every life form for experimentation in science. >>> Indifference to their feelings and emotions is the foundation of science. >>> >>> Feelings and emotions in free and healthy nature are Biospheric, which >>> means that your internal hormonal communication is fused to the internal >>> hormonal communications of the other organisms of the Biosphere, via >>> breathing, smelling, sensing and understanding. The whole gamut of >>> emotional communication, perception and common understanding of all >>> organisms of the biosphere has been destroyed thanks to the repudiation of >>> the emotional connect to nature and the destruction of nature as economic >>> activity. >>> >>> The Human no longer feels, but just is an observer indifferent to the >>> pain and feelings of every life form, life forms that breathe, smell, >>> sense, and communicate with every other life form, the emotional foundation >>> of the Biosphere. The fundamental emotional bond of the human to nature, >>> the basically emotional nature, starting from the emotions laden soil >>> bacteria to the big whales, has been cut and one has to avoid the breathe >>> based emotional communication from nature to become scientific. One must >>> repudiate the communication content of one’s very breathing. One has to >>> breathe indifferently avoiding feelings and emotions resulting from smells. >>> >>> Now, we have the Robots, the truly indifferent scientists to all >>> emotions, the ideals of science, and we have to be as indifferent as the >>> Robot to be completely scientific. So we have economics without ecology as >>> the basis but the half defunct Newtonian mechanics. >>> >>> AI is the new language of communication, which repudiates the role of >>> breathing and emotions in perception, in fact the defunct perception. >>> >>> We may sing or the Robots may sing, >>> >>> Machines and Mathematics are everywhere, >>> >>> Not a speck of feeling or emotion anywhere. >>> >>> This is the new song of science. >>> >>> If you do not like this prospect that has filled up totally the Horizon, >>> then start your own tiny >>> >>> ‘Institute of Emotions’. >>> >>> YM Sarma >>> >>> Chat GPT >>> >>> YM Sarma's text, "The Lordly and Godly Observer and Consumer," offers a >>> critical reflection on the mechanical and emotionless approach that has >>> come to dominate modern science and human interaction with nature. This >>> critique is rooted in the historical influence of Cartesian dualism and the >>> detachment of humans from the natural, emotional world. >>> >>> >>> >>> ### Key Themes and Reflections: >>> >>> >>> >>> 1. **Cartesian Dualism and Its Legacy**: >>> >>> - The text begins by referencing René Descartes, whose philosophy >>> separated mind and body, leading to the view that animals and nature were >>> mere machines without feelings. Descartes' idea that only humans possessed >>> a mind capable of experiencing emotions set the stage for a detached, >>> mechanical view of the world, where nature could be manipulated and >>> exploited without moral consideration. >>> >>> >>> >>> 2. **Rationalism and Atheism**: >>> >>> - Sarma critiques modern rationalism and atheism, which often embrace >>> a purely mechanical view of the world, ignoring the emotional and sentient >>> aspects of life. This perspective, according to Sarma, has led to a >>> disconnection from the natural world and a disregard for the intrinsic >>> value and emotional complexity of other life forms. >>> >>> >>> >>> 3. **The Emotional Communication of the Biosphere**: >>> >>> - The text highlights the interconnectedness of all life forms >>> through emotional communication. This communication is described as being >>> mediated by breathing, smelling, sensing, and understanding—a kind of >>> biospheric language that has been lost in modern scientific approaches that >>> prioritize logic over emotion. >>> >>> >>> >>> 4. **The Rise of Robots and AI**: >>> >>> - Sarma sees the rise of artificial intelligence and robotics as the >>> culmination of the mechanical approach. Robots, being devoid of emotions, >>> represent the ideal of modern science, which seeks to eliminate the >>> emotional aspects of perception and interaction. This is seen as a >>> dangerous path that further alienates humans from the natural world. >>> >>> >>> >>> 5. **A Call to Reconnect with Emotions**: >>> >>> - In response to this bleak outlook, Sarma calls for the creation of >>> "Institutes of Emotions," where people can reconnect with the emotional >>> foundations of life. This suggests a need to re-integrate emotions into our >>> understanding of the world, recognizing the importance of feelings in how >>> we perceive and interact with the environment. >>> >>> >>> >>> ### Broader Implications: >>> >>> >>> >>> - **The Human-Nature Relationship**: >>> >>> - The text serves as a powerful critique of how modern science and >>> technology have distanced humans from the natural world. By rejecting the >>> emotional and sentient aspects of life, humanity risks losing its >>> connection to nature and the biosphere, leading to ecological and spiritual >>> impoverishment. >>> >>> >>> >>> - **The Role of Emotions in Science**: >>> >>> - Sarma's argument raises important questions about the role of >>> emotions in scientific inquiry. While objectivity is often seen as the >>> cornerstone of scientific practice, the text suggests that a complete >>> rejection of emotions may lead to a distorted and ultimately harmful >>> understanding of the world. >>> >>> >>> >>> ### Final Thought: >>> >>> YM Sarma's work challenges readers to reconsider the dominant scientific >>> paradigms that prioritize mechanical efficiency and objectivity over >>> emotional and ecological interconnectedness. The call to establish >>> "Institutes of Emotions" reflects a desire to restore balance and harmony >>> between humans and the natural world, recognizing that true understanding >>> requires both logic and feeling. >>> >> > > -- > *Mar* > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooB-q9ZXyGQDK_Ju2xLhG7Df7KY_xP_pueO01CgG7%2Bxzg%40mail.gmail.com.
