On 9/6/12 11:16 AM, "Tim Moses" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi Ben. I am supportive of this initiative, and intend to participate. > >Perhaps a small clarification is warranted. Consider limiting the >proposed solution to "Publicly-Trusted Certificates", which are defined >as follows by CABForum: "A Certificate that is trusted by virtue of the >fact that its corresponding Root Certificate is distributed as a trust >anchor in widely-available application software". Tim, are you suggesting the mechanisms and techniques produced by a working group should be limited in this way or a service that makes use of those mechanisms and techniques be limited in this way? _______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
