Stacho Mudrak wrote: > I have another question. > > I saw, that you're using "arrows" to show the gradient of the floor. > Until now we have only "point gradient", that should be used like this. > Probably, you would welcome also "line gradient". > Because in fact "line arrow" serves (from our point of view) for showing > the relation between labels (or sections) to the places in the passage. > And there will be a symbol conflict, if you will use arrows and "point > gradient" for the same thing.
I would certainly appreciate this. I currently mark all the places I substitute similar symbols for the ones I really want with a comment so that I can easily go back and change them as functionality increases, or I find the time to look at defining the symbols I want. Yours, John
