>> join fsceil1 at river:0 farsidewest3 at river:7 > > > That's actually a rather odd syntax don't you think? The syntax in thbook > seems rather more sensible to me (with the smaller parts to the left). > Thinking about it 0:fsceil1 at river would actually be the most logical, but > somehow that doesn't seem as clear as fsceil1:0 at river
If we take 'fsceil1 at river' as a full-ID, then the current syntax means <full-id>:<mark>, which is odd, but consistent -- isn't it? Martin
