+++ Martin Budaj [04-03-01 13:30 +0100]: >>>> >>join fsceil1 at river:0 farsidewest3 at river:7 >> >>> > >>> >That's actually a rather odd syntax don't you think? The syntax in thbook >>> >seems rather more sensible to me (with the smaller parts to the left). >>> >Thinking about it 0:fsceil1 at river would actually be the most logical, >>> >but >>> >somehow that doesn't seem as clear as fsceil1:0 at river > >> >> If we take 'fsceil1 at river' as a full-ID, then the current syntax means >> <full-id>:<mark>, which is odd, but consistent -- isn't it?
yes. fair enough. Wookey -- Aleph One Ltd, Bottisham, CAMBRIDGE, CB5 9BA, UK Tel +44 (0) 1223 811679 work: http://www.aleph1.co.uk/ play: http://www.chaos.org.uk/~wookey/
