Hi Stacho, hello Bruce,
you understood correctly.
The problem here is, we are talking about uncorrelated maps and scraps.
They are from several subsurveys.
is there any kind of debug output i can activate to get the average
scrap height?
And is the sorting done scrap-wise, or are the maps averaged?
Am 2019-05-30 22:27, schrieb Stacho Mudrak:
Hello,
if you select just survey, then all maps consisting of scraps in this
and sub-surveys should be ordered by average altitude. But this may
easily cause that some overlapping is not done correctly. But it is
also possible, there is some bug and it is not done correctly. Are you
able to post some minimalistic sample, where depth sort fails?
The only way how to manually order maps in the output is to create
upper-level maps (in your case probably what you mean by
<region>-Hautplan) consisting of lower level maps in the correct
order.
HTH, S.
On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 15:55, Benedikt Hallinger <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hello there,
i have a very large dataset here. It is organised by regions like
this
(but much more leaf objects and regions):
=====snip=====
- survey TheCave
- survey RegionWest
- survey 1
- survey 3
- survey 5
- survey RegionEast
- survey 2
- survey 4
- survey 6
=====snap=====
I currently work from bottom to up, that is i draw the individual
surveys as scraps, based on original material (sometimes they are
really
large and cosnsist of several many scraps).
In each of they leaf surveys (the numbered ones) i make by
convention a
map called "<n>-Hauptplan". The main idea is that every leaf survey
can
be treaten modular and that i can compile varoius maps at upper
levels
(i.e regions).
Currently, the regions have no "<region>-Hautplan". When i use
"select
RegionWest.TheCave", therion is instructed to select all scraps
below
it. For the most part, this works like intendet and the overlappings
are
calculated correctly. There are some places however, where the upper
part of the passage is rendered below the lower part, which is
wrong.
This is with about 10-15% of the passages (so most is already ok).
I know from the manuals that therion does this "randomly" so there
is no
real way to adjust this from my perspective (placing the "input 2.th
[1]"
command in the region.th [2] file, wich then inputs the scraps etc,
lower in
the list does not help - it seems random where it is).
I think, however, that it would be a very great addition, if there
would
be some code in the renderer, that sorts the vertical presentation
of
the scraps/maps by average altitude of said scrap/map, and that this
behavior is controllable by some configuration (cmdline option, or
even
better, thconfig parameter).
=> Is there maybe already something hidden like this i don't know so
far?
That would be very great, because when i look at the dataset, i face
about 30-50 hours producing correctly manually sorted handcrafted
maps
at the region level...
Sincerely, Beni
_______________________________________________
Therion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
Links:
------
[1] http://2.th
[2] http://region.th
_______________________________________________
Therion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
_______________________________________________
Therion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
