Honestly, since I started using MSE, my malware problems have ll but evaporated. Many times better than McAfee, which was slow and often had problems it could not fix. Still, always need to stay vigilant!
On Saturday, October 5, 2013 10:33:04 PM UTC-4, cwpreston wrote: > I used to suggest this to everyone I knew that used Windows, but I don't > know if I still will now. > > http://lifehacker.com/microsoft-admits-that-third-party-antivirus-is-more-eff-1441135677 > > Microsoft Admits That Third-Party Antivirus Is More Effective Than MSE > > I forgot it was just that easy. > > Make a system with next to no vulnerabilities. Then the vulnerabilities > that it does have, use another system to catch it. That second system has > to be perfect though. Otherwise you need a system to catch the > vulnerabilities of the second system. > > Seriously.. there is always going to be software vulnerabilities. Whether > its at the OS level or an application level. > > What MS is doing is actually a good thing. They are working to try to make > sure that users (even ones who use relatively bad AV) are at least > semi-protected. > > Also, there's a whole industry built around Malware on Windows because > Windows is the most used platform. This means money for the malware > creators. Even if Microsoft poured *every dollar of their money* into it, > someone somewhere would eventually be able to find another > vulnerability.Yesterday > 9:53am<http://lifehacker.com/i-forgot-it-was-just-that-easy-make-a-system-with-ne-1441198634> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Unique Geek" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
