Pat,

Is possible to do a specific search wihout a morphology, and with
morphology in config file set with metaphone?

Thanks

On 14 jul, 04:05, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Raphael
>
> It definitely looks like you need the database index on that column - 
> something like the following in a migration should do the trick:
>
>   add_index :entry_values, :entry_id
>
> Give that a shot, let us know if it helps.
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Pat
>
> On 14/07/2010, at 3:33 PM, Raphael wrote:
>
> > Without that Field
>
> > ~/Ruby Projects/ngforms ree-1.8.7 (master) $ rake ts:rebuild
> > (in /Users/raphael/Ruby Projects/ngforms)
> > Stopped search daemon (pid 865).
> > Generating Configuration to /Users/raphael/Ruby 
> > Projects/ngforms/config/development.sphinx.conf
> > Sphinx 0.9.9-release (r2117)
> > Copyright (c) 2001-2009, Andrew Aksyonoff
>
> > using config file '/Users/raphael/Ruby 
> > Projects/ngforms/config/development.sphinx.conf'...
> > indexing index 'database_core'...
> > collected 6 docs, 0.0 MB
> > sorted 0.0 Mhits, 100.0% done
> > total 6 docs, 45 bytes
> > total 0.009 sec, 4741 bytes/sec, 632.17 docs/sec
> > distributed index 'database' can not be directly indexed; skipping.
> > indexing index 'entry_core'...
> > collected 57842 docs, 0.3 MB
> > sorted 0.1 Mhits, 100.0% done
> > total 57842 docs, 272056 bytes
> > total 0.729 sec, 373143 bytes/sec, 79334.18 docs/sec
> > distributed index 'entry' can not be directly indexed; skipping.
> > indexing index 'entry_value_core'...
> > collected 254217 docs, 5.3 MB
> > sorted 0.5 Mhits, 100.0% done
> > total 254217 docs, 5282422 bytes
> > total 3.683 sec, 1434192 bytes/sec, 69020.65 docs/sec
> > distributed index 'entry_value' can not be directly indexed; skipping.
> > total 9 reads, 0.016 sec, 936.7 kb/call avg, 1.8 msec/call avg
> > total 32 writes, 0.079 sec, 590.6 kb/call avg, 2.4 msec/call avg
> > Started successfully (pid 899).
> > ~/Ruby Projects/ngforms ree-1.8.7 (master) $
>
> > class Entry < ActiveRecord::Base
>
> >   has_many :entry_values, :dependent => :destroy
>
> >   define_index do
> >     #indexes entry_values(:value_string), :as => :value_string
> >     indexes entry_number
> >     has has_error, created_at, updated_at
> >   end
> > end
>
> > class EntryValue < ActiveRecord::Base
> >   belongs_to :entry
>
> >   define_index do
> >     indexes value_string
> >     has entry_id
> >   end
>
> > end
>
> > -------
>
> > With this field take more than one hour to index...
>
> > Raphael William Costa
> > Telefone.   +55 41 8401273
> > Email.         [email protected]
> > Internet.      http://www.raphaelcosta.net
>
> > Em 14/07/2010, às 00:50, Pat Allan escreveu:
>
> >> Hi Raphael
>
> >> How long did an index take without that field? And how long does it take 
> >> when you add it? Do you have a database index on the entry_id column in 
> >> the entry_values table?
>
> >> Cheers
>
> >> --
> >> Pat
>
> >> On 14/07/2010, at 12:52 PM, Raphael wrote:
>
> >>> Hi,
>
> >>> I have a entry that has many entry_values...
>
> >>> And i need to get Entries that has a entry_values.value_string for
> >>> example.
>
> >>> Entry.rb
>
> >>> define_index do
> >>>   indexes entry_values.value_string, :as => :entry_value_string
> >>> end
>
> >>> But that solution take so long to index in compare to index
> >>> entry_value fields...
>
> >>> Is correct to use like that? or How can i return a Entry in a
> >>> EntryValue.search ?
>
> >>> Thanks in Advance,
> >>> Raphael Costa
>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> >>> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >>> [email protected].
> >>> For more options, visit this group 
> >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> >> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> [email protected].
> >> For more options, visit this group 
> >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.

Reply via email to