i thinked that indexes are generated automatically by raisl =/
Raphael William Costa 
Telefone.   +55 41 8401273
Email.         [email protected]
Internet.      http://www.raphaelcosta.net

Em 17/07/2010, às 00:09, Pat Allan escreveu:

> It's definitely a good idea to index all foreign keys - whether you're using 
> Sphinx or not.
> 
> -- 
> Pat
> 
> On 15/07/2010, at 4:32 AM, Raphael wrote:
> 
>> Hi Pat,
>> 
>> Thanks! Now is taking only 20 seconds to index!!
>> I need to create a index in all references?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Raphael William Costa 
>> Telefone.   +55 41 8401273
>> Email.         [email protected]
>> Internet.      http://www.raphaelcosta.net
>> 
>> Em 14/07/2010, às 04:05, Pat Allan escreveu:
>> 
>>> Hi Raphael
>>> 
>>> It definitely looks like you need the database index on that column - 
>>> something like the following in a migration should do the trick:
>>> 
>>> add_index :entry_values, :entry_id
>>> 
>>> Give that a shot, let us know if it helps.
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Pat
>>> 
>>> On 14/07/2010, at 3:33 PM, Raphael wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Without that Field
>>>> 
>>>> ~/Ruby Projects/ngforms ree-1.8.7 (master) $ rake ts:rebuild
>>>> (in /Users/raphael/Ruby Projects/ngforms)
>>>> Stopped search daemon (pid 865).
>>>> Generating Configuration to /Users/raphael/Ruby 
>>>> Projects/ngforms/config/development.sphinx.conf
>>>> Sphinx 0.9.9-release (r2117)
>>>> Copyright (c) 2001-2009, Andrew Aksyonoff
>>>> 
>>>> using config file '/Users/raphael/Ruby 
>>>> Projects/ngforms/config/development.sphinx.conf'...
>>>> indexing index 'database_core'...
>>>> collected 6 docs, 0.0 MB
>>>> sorted 0.0 Mhits, 100.0% done
>>>> total 6 docs, 45 bytes
>>>> total 0.009 sec, 4741 bytes/sec, 632.17 docs/sec
>>>> distributed index 'database' can not be directly indexed; skipping.
>>>> indexing index 'entry_core'...
>>>> collected 57842 docs, 0.3 MB
>>>> sorted 0.1 Mhits, 100.0% done
>>>> total 57842 docs, 272056 bytes
>>>> total 0.729 sec, 373143 bytes/sec, 79334.18 docs/sec
>>>> distributed index 'entry' can not be directly indexed; skipping.
>>>> indexing index 'entry_value_core'...
>>>> collected 254217 docs, 5.3 MB
>>>> sorted 0.5 Mhits, 100.0% done
>>>> total 254217 docs, 5282422 bytes
>>>> total 3.683 sec, 1434192 bytes/sec, 69020.65 docs/sec
>>>> distributed index 'entry_value' can not be directly indexed; skipping.
>>>> total 9 reads, 0.016 sec, 936.7 kb/call avg, 1.8 msec/call avg
>>>> total 32 writes, 0.079 sec, 590.6 kb/call avg, 2.4 msec/call avg
>>>> Started successfully (pid 899).
>>>> ~/Ruby Projects/ngforms ree-1.8.7 (master) $ 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> class Entry < ActiveRecord::Base
>>>> 
>>>> has_many :entry_values, :dependent => :destroy
>>>> 
>>>> define_index do
>>>>   #indexes entry_values(:value_string), :as => :value_string
>>>>   indexes entry_number
>>>>   has has_error, created_at, updated_at
>>>> end
>>>> end
>>>> 
>>>> class EntryValue < ActiveRecord::Base
>>>> belongs_to :entry
>>>> 
>>>> define_index do
>>>>   indexes value_string
>>>>   has entry_id
>>>> end
>>>> 
>>>> end
>>>> 
>>>> -------
>>>> 
>>>> With this field take more than one hour to index...
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Raphael William Costa 
>>>> Telefone.   +55 41 8401273
>>>> Email.         [email protected]
>>>> Internet.      http://www.raphaelcosta.net
>>>> 
>>>> Em 14/07/2010, às 00:50, Pat Allan escreveu:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Raphael
>>>>> 
>>>>> How long did an index take without that field? And how long does it take 
>>>>> when you add it? Do you have a database index on the entry_id column in 
>>>>> the entry_values table?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Pat
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 14/07/2010, at 12:52 PM, Raphael wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I have a entry that has many entry_values...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> And i need to get Entries that has a entry_values.value_string for
>>>>>> example.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Entry.rb
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> define_index do
>>>>>> indexes entry_values.value_string, :as => :entry_value_string
>>>>>> end
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> But that solution take so long to index in compare to index
>>>>>> entry_value fields...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Is correct to use like that? or How can i return a Entry in a
>>>>>> EntryValue.search ?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks in Advance,
>>>>>> Raphael Costa
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.

Reply via email to