It's definitely a good idea to index all foreign keys - whether you're using Sphinx or not.
-- Pat On 15/07/2010, at 4:32 AM, Raphael wrote: > Hi Pat, > > Thanks! Now is taking only 20 seconds to index!! > I need to create a index in all references? > > Thanks, > Raphael William Costa > Telefone. +55 41 8401273 > Email. [email protected] > Internet. http://www.raphaelcosta.net > > Em 14/07/2010, às 04:05, Pat Allan escreveu: > >> Hi Raphael >> >> It definitely looks like you need the database index on that column - >> something like the following in a migration should do the trick: >> >> add_index :entry_values, :entry_id >> >> Give that a shot, let us know if it helps. >> >> Cheers >> >> -- >> Pat >> >> On 14/07/2010, at 3:33 PM, Raphael wrote: >> >>> Without that Field >>> >>> ~/Ruby Projects/ngforms ree-1.8.7 (master) $ rake ts:rebuild >>> (in /Users/raphael/Ruby Projects/ngforms) >>> Stopped search daemon (pid 865). >>> Generating Configuration to /Users/raphael/Ruby >>> Projects/ngforms/config/development.sphinx.conf >>> Sphinx 0.9.9-release (r2117) >>> Copyright (c) 2001-2009, Andrew Aksyonoff >>> >>> using config file '/Users/raphael/Ruby >>> Projects/ngforms/config/development.sphinx.conf'... >>> indexing index 'database_core'... >>> collected 6 docs, 0.0 MB >>> sorted 0.0 Mhits, 100.0% done >>> total 6 docs, 45 bytes >>> total 0.009 sec, 4741 bytes/sec, 632.17 docs/sec >>> distributed index 'database' can not be directly indexed; skipping. >>> indexing index 'entry_core'... >>> collected 57842 docs, 0.3 MB >>> sorted 0.1 Mhits, 100.0% done >>> total 57842 docs, 272056 bytes >>> total 0.729 sec, 373143 bytes/sec, 79334.18 docs/sec >>> distributed index 'entry' can not be directly indexed; skipping. >>> indexing index 'entry_value_core'... >>> collected 254217 docs, 5.3 MB >>> sorted 0.5 Mhits, 100.0% done >>> total 254217 docs, 5282422 bytes >>> total 3.683 sec, 1434192 bytes/sec, 69020.65 docs/sec >>> distributed index 'entry_value' can not be directly indexed; skipping. >>> total 9 reads, 0.016 sec, 936.7 kb/call avg, 1.8 msec/call avg >>> total 32 writes, 0.079 sec, 590.6 kb/call avg, 2.4 msec/call avg >>> Started successfully (pid 899). >>> ~/Ruby Projects/ngforms ree-1.8.7 (master) $ >>> >>> >>> class Entry < ActiveRecord::Base >>> >>> has_many :entry_values, :dependent => :destroy >>> >>> define_index do >>> #indexes entry_values(:value_string), :as => :value_string >>> indexes entry_number >>> has has_error, created_at, updated_at >>> end >>> end >>> >>> class EntryValue < ActiveRecord::Base >>> belongs_to :entry >>> >>> define_index do >>> indexes value_string >>> has entry_id >>> end >>> >>> end >>> >>> ------- >>> >>> With this field take more than one hour to index... >>> >>> >>> >>> Raphael William Costa >>> Telefone. +55 41 8401273 >>> Email. [email protected] >>> Internet. http://www.raphaelcosta.net >>> >>> Em 14/07/2010, às 00:50, Pat Allan escreveu: >>> >>>> Hi Raphael >>>> >>>> How long did an index take without that field? And how long does it take >>>> when you add it? Do you have a database index on the entry_id column in >>>> the entry_values table? >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Pat >>>> >>>> On 14/07/2010, at 12:52 PM, Raphael wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I have a entry that has many entry_values... >>>>> >>>>> And i need to get Entries that has a entry_values.value_string for >>>>> example. >>>>> >>>>> Entry.rb >>>>> >>>>> define_index do >>>>> indexes entry_values.value_string, :as => :entry_value_string >>>>> end >>>>> >>>>> But that solution take so long to index in compare to index >>>>> entry_value fields... >>>>> >>>>> Is correct to use like that? or How can i return a Entry in a >>>>> EntryValue.search ? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in Advance, >>>>> Raphael Costa >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>>> "Thinking Sphinx" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>> "Thinking Sphinx" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Thinking Sphinx" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Thinking Sphinx" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. >> > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
