Speaking of aspect ratios... My preferred aspect ratio is definitely 4:3, though I happily make an exception for 1900x1200 widescreen. The 'HD' resolutions that manufacturers have been pushing (in my opinion, strictly for cost saving reasons and the cachet of 'HD') are ridiculously useless resolutions given the max vertical they offer (1080). Why would you want to get a screen that is no wider than typical resolutions but is shorter (1920x1080 'HD' versus 1920x1200 'normal')?? That's a step backwards. A computer is NOT an movie viewer! I guess I could live with the wide/short HD format easier if the vertical was 1200 or higher.
Rob On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:07 -1000, "David Ross" <[email protected]> wrote: > "Best screen" is to some extent a matter of personal choice. I've just > moved from 1400x1050 4:3 to 1280x800 16:10 and find new things to hate > about > it every day. > > David -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Access all of your messages and folders wherever you are _______________________________________________ Thinkpad mailing list [email protected] http://stderr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/thinkpad
