I'm happy to resubmit a patch with agreed-upon wording. This what we
want?
/**
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
* or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
* distributed with this work for additional information
* regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
* to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
* "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
* with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
* software distributed under the License is distributed on an
* "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
* KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
* specific language governing permissions and limitations
* under the License.
*/
- a
On Mar 20, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Michael Greene wrote:
I can't speak to the Cocoa-specific patches, but Andrew's issue that
was moved to THRIFT-158 is a blocker for release--we might want to
have clarity on whether the first couple of sentences of the header
here: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html are a requirement,
as this patch omits them. Apart from this omission, the patch looks
good.
Michael
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Andrew McGeachie <[email protected]
> wrote:
I would very much appreciate it if someone could apply these patches:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-158
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-280
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-60
My poor Cocoa libraries are still sad & neglected. :(
- a
