A common approach in other Apache projects is to declare a feature
freeze date, after which no new functionality can be added. Only bug
fixes can be applied.
If we took this approach we could classify issues as bugs or
features, and use that to focus our development for the release.
-Bryan
On Mar 22, 2009, at 8:47 AM, Jérémie BORDIER wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Kevin Clark
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
That looks consistent with what I've been putting on the Ruby files.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Andrew McGeachie
<[email protected]> wrote:
I'm happy to resubmit a patch with agreed-upon wording. This
what we want?
/**
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
* or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
* distributed with this work for additional information
* regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
* to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
* "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
* with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
* software distributed under the License is distributed on an
* "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
* KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
* specific language governing permissions and limitations
* under the License.
*/
- a
On Mar 20, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Michael Greene wrote:
I can't speak to the Cocoa-specific patches, but Andrew's issue
that
was moved to THRIFT-158 is a blocker for release--we might want to
have clarity on whether the first couple of sentences of the header
here: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html are a
requirement,
as this patch omits them. Apart from this omission, the patch
looks
good.
Michael
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Andrew McGeachie
<[email protected]>
wrote:
I would very much appreciate it if someone could apply these
patches:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-158
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-280
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-60
My poor Cocoa libraries are still sad & neglected. :(
- a
There have been a couple issues tagged to fix for 0.1 lately which i
really doesn't consider as blocking... (THRIFT-154, THRIFT-72,
THRIFT-360?). Do you guys agree for these issues to be "downgraded" so
we can keep reasonable objectives for the 0.1 ?
--
Jérémie 'ahFeel' BORDIER
