Hi Andrew, That looks consistent with what I've been putting on the Ruby files.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Andrew McGeachie <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm happy to resubmit a patch with agreed-upon wording. This what we want? > > /** > * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one > * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file > * distributed with this work for additional information > * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file > * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the > * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance > * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at > * > * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > * > * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, > * software distributed under the License is distributed on an > * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY > * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the > * specific language governing permissions and limitations > * under the License. > */ > > > > - a > > On Mar 20, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Michael Greene wrote: > >> I can't speak to the Cocoa-specific patches, but Andrew's issue that >> was moved to THRIFT-158 is a blocker for release--we might want to >> have clarity on whether the first couple of sentences of the header >> here: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html are a requirement, >> as this patch omits them. Apart from this omission, the patch looks >> good. >> >> Michael >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Andrew McGeachie <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> I would very much appreciate it if someone could apply these patches: >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-158 >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-280 >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-60 >>> >>> My poor Cocoa libraries are still sad & neglected. :( >>> >>> - a > > -- Kevin Clark http://glu.ttono.us
