[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12694802#action_12694802
 ] 

Michael Stockton commented on THRIFT-276:
-----------------------------------------

bq. I'm not wild about this. I don't see the "protocol" suffixes (or for that 
matter, the "transport" suffixes") as a really big benefit. I'd much rather see 
us use a Thrift::Protocol namespace than focus on ending the names with 
Protocol.

I completely understand.  I tried to focus on consistency as much as possible.  
Although renaming the accelerated protocol to be inline with compact_protocol 
and binary_protocol is mostly aesthetic, I figured it would be beneficial down 
the road to have a strong convention.  If we reach a consensus either way, I'll 
be happy.

bq. There's still a bunch of classes in transport.rb and protocol.rb. They look 
like reasonable things to keep together (Sockets mostly in transport, and 
errors). Was that the idea?

Correct, I kept Socket, for example, in transport.rb because it didn't feel 
sensible to have a class named SocketTransport.  I can certainly split Socket 
and ServerSocket out the way Bryan suggests.  We could also consider have a 
base.rb file. 



> Ruby libraries should have one class per file
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-276
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-276
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Library (Ruby)
>    Affects Versions: 0.1
>            Reporter: Bryan Duxbury
>            Assignee: Michael Stockton
>            Priority: Trivial
>         Attachments: thrift-276-v2.patch, thrift-276-v3.patch, 
> thrift-276.patch
>
>
> There's no reason for so many of our classes to be lumped into the same file. 
> For instance, transport.rb contains 9 classes. They may be short, but 
> organizationally, it's superior to have separate class files. Of course, some 
> files may contain more than one class per file as appropriate - things like a 
> protocol and its factory, for instance, are perfectly acceptable to group.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to