I certainly do intend to maintain the rubygem. I'm not sure that I have the necessary credentials to publish the gem to rubyforge, though. You can build the gem by doing "cd lib/rb && rake package".
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Rajesh Malepati <chitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > My ruby client/server tests pass. I had to regenerate the ruby classes > though. The 0.2 generated ones are incompatible with 0.4. > > One small question. Evan Weaver used to release ruby library as a gem. > That didn't happen for 0.3. > > See http://rubygems.org/gems/thrift and http://github.com/fauna/thrift-rb > I also see Kevin Ballard, Kevin Clark and Mark Slee as authors on the > rubygems.org page. Is there any interest in maintaining the gem > version? > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Michael Lum <michael....@openx.org> > wrote: > > Works fine on CentOS 5.5. On Snow Leopard, make check was returning > this: > > > > libtool: link: g++ -g -O2 -o .libs/UnitTests UnitTests-UnitTestMain.o > > UnitTests-TMemoryBufferTest.o UnitTests-TBufferBaseTest.o > -Wl,-bind_at_load > > ./.libs/libtestgencpp.a > > /Users/mlum/temp/0.4.x/thrift-0.4.0/lib/cpp/.libs/libthrift.dylib > > -lboost_unit_test_framework -lpthread > > ld: library not found for -lboost_unit_test_framework > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > make[2]: *** [UnitTests] Error 1 > > make[1]: *** [check-am] Error 2 > > make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 > > > > I have boost-1.42.0 installed using MacPorts in /opt/local. Changing the > > Makefile.am to add $(BOOST_LDFLAGS) to UnitTests_LDADD causes this test > to > > pass. All other tests passed. > > > > --- test/Makefile.am.orig 2010-08-12 23:29:21.000000000 -0700 > > +++ test/Makefile.am 2010-08-12 23:34:28.000000000 -0700 > > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ > > TMemoryBufferTest.cpp \ > > TBufferBaseTest.cpp > > > > -UnitTests_LDADD = libtestgencpp.la -lboost_unit_test_framework > > +UnitTests_LDADD = libtestgencpp.la $(BOOST_LDFLAGS) > > -lboost_unit_test_framework > > > > # > > # TFDTransportTest > > > > Otherwise, +1. > > > > On 8/12/2010 9:40 PM, Bryan Duxbury wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> As discussed, in all the time it took for us to finally release Thrift > >> 0.3, > >> we've accumulated enough changes for Thrift 0.4! > >> > >> I propose we accept > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~bryanduxbury/thrift-0.4.0-rc0.tar.gz<http://people.apache.org/%7Ebryanduxbury/thrift-0.4.0-rc0.tar.gz> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Ebryanduxbury/thrift-0.4.0-rc0.tar.gz>as > >> the official Thrift 0.4.0 release. > >> > >> I created this tarball by checking out URL: > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/thrift/branches/0.4.x and > >> running > >> "./bootstrap.sh&& ./configure&& make dist". > >> > >> The GPG signature for this tarball can be found at > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~bryanduxbury/thrift-0.4.0-rc0.tar.gz.asc<http://people.apache.org/%7Ebryanduxbury/thrift-0.4.0-rc0.tar.gz.asc> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Ebryanduxbury/thrift-0.4.0-rc0.tar.gz.asc>. > >> It has an MD5 signature of c272591c1b3560fdef86104e2be214dc. > >> > >> Please download, verify the signatures, untar, and install and test the > >> libraries you are familiar with. We need your +1 votes to make the > >> release! > >> If you encounter any problems, please let me know immediately. This vote > >> will close 72 hours from now. > >> > >> This release consists of 45 tickets that cover many bugs and performance > >> improvements. Please refer to the CHANGES file for the full list. > >> > >> -Bryan > >> > > >
