On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 23:31 +0200, Radu Cadariu wrote:
> On Dec 16, 2007 7:03 PM, Skippy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > La fel ca în cazul multor altor produse (.NET, Internet Explorer 7,
> > Vista), OOXML este doar o replică la o ameninţarea concurenţială.
> > Dacă acea ameninţare nu ar fi existat, aceste produse nu ar fi apărut
> > niciodată. Un monopol nu are nevoie să inoveze.
> >
> 
> ultima propozitiune mi-a declansat amintirea unui articol citit despre
> istoria MS din perspectiva baricadei ODF, insa care mie mi se pare
> documentat, comentariile sunt binevenite, poate mai invat si eu cate
> ceva.

Prin toamna lui 2005 Microsoft a aniversat 30 de ani si am scris atunci
un articol pentru Business Magazin pe tema asta. In mare masura e
valabil si azi (din punctul meu de vedere, of course):

http://www.intraweb.ro/txt/Articole/Weboscop/Microsoft/show

Mircea

ps/ Pentru comparatie, articolul echivalent pentru Apple :-)

http://www.intraweb.ro/txt/Articole/Weboscop/Apple30/show


> Mi s-a parut foarte interesant, citat din Chapter 2:
> 
> " Instead, Gates and his partners paid careful attention to what was
> available and successful in the marketplace, and had no compunction
> about copying the basic designs of products already in the market.  In
> any event, while Microsoft's developers could be creative at the code
> level, its success was built far more on innovation in business
> strategy rather than innovation at the level of product design.  In
> the early days of Microsoft, this path was eminently available,
> because software could not then be patented.  Even after that rule was
> conclusively overturned in the courts in 1998 (ruling on a patent
> initially granted in 1993), copying the concepts, but not the actual
> copyright-protected code or screen displays of existing software
> remained fair game for a time.  Only gradually did a sufficient number
> of software patents accumulate to begin to inhibit the ability of one
> vendor to create products that substantially replicated the
> functionalities of competing products."
> 
> http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/index.php?topic=20071125145019553
> 
> R.C.
> 
> ===========================================================
> Pentru a renunta la abonament trimiteti un mail catre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> incluzind in corpul mesajului: "unsubscribe tic-lobby <adresa_email>".
> Pagina web a listei se afla la 
> http://beta.agora.ro/agora-bin/lwgate/TIC-LOBBY/
> Arhiva se afla la http://beta.agora.ro/agora-bin/lwgate/tic-lobby/archives/

===========================================================
Pentru a renunta la abonament trimiteti un mail catre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
incluzind in corpul mesajului: "unsubscribe tic-lobby <adresa_email>".
Pagina web a listei se afla la http://beta.agora.ro/agora-bin/lwgate/TIC-LOBBY/
Arhiva se afla la http://beta.agora.ro/agora-bin/lwgate/tic-lobby/archives/

Raspunde prin e-mail lui