Daniel, that also works. BTW, you need not give the exact version of the WG draft, but tag it as "in progress".
Cheers, Yuanlong > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Franke [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 8:45 PM > To: Jiangyuanlong > Cc: Karen O'Donoghue; [email protected]; [email protected]; Sharon Goldberg; > Aanchal Malhotra > Subject: Re: [Ntp] WGLC for draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp > > On 8/31/17, Jiangyuanlong <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, after going through this draft, I am not sure whether > > ietf-ntp-data-minimization-00 should be listed in the Normative > > Reference, or not at all. > > I was *just* about to bring this up myself. I think it's properly an > informative > reference. > > Sharon, Aanchal, CCing the two of you because I recall you had a different > opinion last year in Boston and thought it should stay a normative reference > (but I'm not sure I understood you correctly then). Note that this is a > completely separate issue from whether data minimization should be > published as Standards Track vs. Informational. > It can stay a Standards Track document and still be cited from NTS for > Informative purposes. _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
