For the given application (comparison of performance of two different techniques), I fail to see how that is supposed to work. Should running code be created for BOTH transport mechanisms (DTLS encapsulation and regular NTP packet with authenticator token) before a decision is made? I believe that is taking the "running code" maxim too far.
Von: "Gary E. Miller" <[email protected]> An: Kopie: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Datum: 01.09.2017 00:18 Betreff: Re: [Ntp] WGLC for draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp Gesendet von: "ntp" <[email protected]> Yo Daniel! On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 08:34:02 -0400 Daniel Franke <[email protected]> wrote: > Lots of people on this list seem to have the intuition that sending > time packets over DTLS can never be as accurate as sending them over > the NTP port with an authenticator attached. But as I showed in my > analysis the other day, that just ain't so. Analysis is great, but I'd like to see running code. RGDS GARY --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 [email protected] Tel:+1 541 382 8588 Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas? "If you can?t measure it, you can?t improve it." - Lord Kelvin [Anhang "attpwg8d.dat" gelöscht von Kristof Teichel/PTB] _______________________________________________ ntp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp
_______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
