I suppose I am a geek, however I have made a career of converting geek speak to end user and back again.
I would suggest a separate development effort with lots of user interaction and review to boost TiddlyWiki's end user adoption. Even for me it took a little time to realise it real capabilities and understand it's paradigms. By the time I understood it's simple elegance I had made it very complex with plugins. I am currently converting my Father and Girl Friend over to tiddlywiki so I am gaining some insight into this process. I believe there are a few items such as search, goto, less backups, newHere, Tabs and tagging tools that need to be seamlsly integrated into the base tiddlywiki for the end user success to grow. Some effective examples (not adaptions) that fully use the various tiddlywiki paradigms are also necessary to get users over he line..... Tony n Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 01:31, Eric Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Aug 10, 2009, at 11:15 AM, Mark S. wrote: > > > Maybe. But in the future, everyone will be geeks ;-) > > Well, if truth be told, I'm no geek, so in that respect I don't really > agree with Lisi. But I'm deeply indebted to and dependent up on geeks, > especiall onee oere,,herere, and in that respect he's absolutely right. > > Regar------ ----------------------- > ---- > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Eric Weir > Decatur, GA USA > [email protected] > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
