Agree with Eric 100%. Restating a comment I posted to him personally, if there was some money in it (developing documentation and functionality standardization), someone would do it.
For open source generally, this is the great transition chasm between interesting for a few and utilized for many. SteveM On Aug 12, 4:03 pm, Eric Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > On Aug 11, 2009, at 1:28 PM, Jar wrote: > > >> I believe there are a few items such as search, goto, less backups, > >> newHere, > >> Tabs and tagging tools that need to be seamlsly integrated into the > >> base > >> tiddlywiki for the end user success to grow. > > > I agree with this. Making the core leaner and transferring some > > functions to plugins made TW more geeky than it used to be ... > > > It would be interesting to start a poll with for instance those items > > (search, goto, less backups, ect) and let people answer if they have a > > plugin for that specific subject in there production TW's (not > > development, test TW's ect). It would give an insight in which plugins > > are mostly used and which function are mostly added by means of a > > plugin. > > How much more simpler can it get than tagging a plugin with > configSystem? For a great many extremely useful plugins that's all it > takes. Granted with with a few it's necessary to add simple code to a > template, and at times I've been irritated by the fact that this > simple necessity is nowhere stated in the documentation of the plugin. > Likewise there are many things that are way beyond me at this point. > All in all, though, I have a system that I'm pretty comfortable with, > and I don't know doodely. > > With the number of plugins out there now, and the duplication of > function that exists among some -- I use BackupOptions rather than > LessBackups -- I imagine there would be a range of opinions about what > should be built in. > > I'd rather not go that route. The main thing I'd like to have is > distillation of the experience, creativity, and wisdom that exists in > this group into a book or manual that would make it easier for > nontechie newbies to get the hang of exploiting TiddlyWiki's amazing > flexibility. That and possibly some standards and a review process > that plugins would have to satisfy before being released for use. > Don't most open source products have this kind of thing? Certainly the > operating system and major application products do. > > Easy for me to say, but I imagine it wouldn't be that difficult for a > good tech writer and one or two savvy TiddlyWiki-ers to put together a > book that provides a basic introduction to TiddlyWiki and improved > documentation of many of the better established and more widely used > plugins. > > As I say, easy for me to say, > > Regards, > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Eric Weir > Decatur, GA USA > [email protected] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
