> it's nice how tiddlywiki provides several measures of hackability, but > when it comes down to it styling it is very difficult
We're aware of these issues. Unfortunately, significant changes are often constrained by backwards-compatibility concerns, as a large number of themes, plugins and individual customizations rely on the current DOM structure and styling. > I've been trying to design it from the inside-out to be more usable We'd love to hear any suggestions you might have. > will I one day be able to rapidly construct a tiddlywiki using a > pre-existing, modularized library of rich javascript functions? is > tiddlywiki backporting some of its features to jQuery itself, rewriting > some of its original features using jQuery, or both? We're definitely aiming to both take advantage of jQuery where sensible and extracting functionality into generic jQuery plugins: http://jquery.tiddlywiki.org Any contributions in that area would be most welcome (best discussed on the developers' list). -- F. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---