Chuck,

As you can see from other answers it is similar to "How long is a piece of 
string?"


   - There are multiple tricks and optimisations, you can use a server and 
   have external media, lazy loading and more. 
   - Clearly with a really massive tiddlywiki you may need to start making 
   choices. choices that are influenced by if this internet available, is it 
   private on local disk or LAN only. 
   - Since I use a lot of tiddlywikis I allow my browsers to use more RAM 
   but I would not expect others to configure their browsers this way.

Marks suggestion of testing it is good, try and make it shareable so people 
can help. 

Of note when mark raised this issue of the 66,000 tiddlers I found a 
performance improvement as well which was different from the one Mark 
finally used. So if he gets a new bottle neck I can help him get further 
performance improvements. 


Unlike other environments there are a lot of ways to manipulate tiddlywiki 
to reach a destination, so I think it is worthwhile trusting the platform 
even although you may still ask questions we have not answered yet.

This is a vital community and you can count on us to help. 

In the *unlikely* case tiddlywiki proves not to be adequate, you will still 
have organised, designed, prototyped and studied your needs such that 
choosing something else will be much easier.

Regards
Tony



On Tuesday, November 26, 2019 at 12:00:38 AM UTC+11, Chuck R. wrote:
>
> Does anyone know of the limits of TW 5.x? 
>
>    1. What is the max number of tiddlers in a file? 
>    2. What is the max amount of text that can be in a tiddler? 
>    3. Is there a max file size for the html file itself?
>
>
> Thank you. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2246b8f0-b0de-4f6d-aa9d-1d71ee4caa21%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to