Thanks Eric, I will and notify you! By the way, We need to store the whole hierarchical list dynamically in a variable and then take care of what is in $:/HistoryList and then highlight the entry in the TOC tree! I don't know any way to measure the impact of each step.
--Mohammad P.S: As I noted already the core TOC is not very faster than toc-tree when it comes to 1000 tiddler! On Monday, January 27, 2020 at 1:21:53 PM UTC+3:30, Eric Shulman wrote: > > On Sunday, January 26, 2020 at 7:35:01 PM UTC-8, Mohammad wrote: >> >> Now the flexible TOC generator works fine and its outliner is really >> helpful. >> My question is how to improve the performance? >> > > I've made a small change to TiddlyTools/TOC/Macros that *might* result in > better performance: > > Instead of using > [title[$here$]tagging[]] > to drive the tree-walking recursion, I now use > [tag[$here$]] > > While this is logically the same, the performance of [tag[...]] should be > better since, as of 5.1.20, Jeremy added: > *"pluggable index modules to accelerate the ... tag Operator (in tests on > a wiki with 60K tiddlers, startup time is reduced by 25% with these > optimisations, and refresh time is reduced by a factor of three.)"* > > Update your copy of TiddlyTools/TOC/Macros and re-run your 1000 tiddler > test case and let me know if it shows any improvement. > > -e > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4bfedaed-5f46-4ea3-954d-b75e514253ad%40googlegroups.com.
