tirsdag den 11. februar 2020 kl. 11.27.42 UTC+1 skrev TonyM: > > HC > > I started work on providing a filter to the tag drop downs and was asking > myself how I may filter them to reduce them in number. > > I then referred back to your original thread and note a large contributor > to your problem is the journal tiddlers, > > > - Is that because you use a given days journal title as a tag to > organise information by day, So have a lot of date tags? > > This was just to give an example. It is not a particular annoying problem for me. the use case was, ifyou use the new journal button, say once a day. after some time you will have alot of tiddlers with the tag journal. and if you press the journal tag you will get a very long and slow list.
You are I assume aware that rather than click the drop down right away, if > you start typing the list will be filtered, however on first click into the > tag name entry, it shows all tags right away. > Yes I am aware. and the first click slowdown is the problem. > > What if this click or responce to each letter typed was disabled and you > had to use the dropdown by click or tabbing to the "tag dropdown", before > the list appeared, then the list will only be those tiddlers that match the > search string? This could popup again after 3 to 4 characters are typed > because by then the possible tag list is reduced. > This is actually a quite good idea with a mix of both approaches. Though I dont know how if these buttons are small on mobile. > > If however your list is not reduced much after 3-4 characters then I > believe there is another approach, please give me an example "string" where > you get too many tag suggestions after the all tag list is displayed if > possible. > no I have not had this problem. Maybe this is feature creep. but I remembered bimlas had some solution where he added a line to the viewtemplate with a list of (selcedted) often used tags. Maybe instead of just showing the alfabetically first rags on the first click, we could only show a list of "selected" tags. when you start to type or press the tag drop down you could get the normal list. - just a thought. > > Regards > Tony > > > On Tuesday, February 11, 2020 at 6:33:47 PM UTC+11, HC Haase wrote: >> >> >> >> søndag den 9. februar 2020 kl. 03.11.14 UTC+1 skrev TonyM: >>> >>> HC, >>> >>> Thanks for starting this discussion - it really helps both learning and >>> development to run such threads. >>> >> >> Glad to hear it. Thanks for your detailed response. >> >>> >>> I would find a limit on the tags would inevitably confuse me and >>> possibly result in my creating new tags of a similar name. >>> >> >> As I imaging it, I don't think so. As soon as you begin to type, the tag >> list would reflect that (like it do now) and you would find the tag. And as >> it is now, when the list of tags run of the page of a pc screen, I don't >> think it gives more clarity than a limited list. (but of course I can't >> speak for you). >> >> Personally I just quickly type a number of characters to quickly limit >>> the choices, perhaps a small delay rather than a character limit would >>> allow you to do the same rather than limit it to three characters, or a >>> setting like for search that sets the minimum number and the delay time. >>> >> >> I guess a delay could also work but I dont see the advantage over >> character limit. >> >> >>> I have a different perspective" To me tags are a quick to use ad hoc >>> method for selecting/categorising tiddlers. This extends to tags that group >>> tags like "status" could tag new, inprogress and done, but they need to be >>> removed as well as added. This is one case where a single value in a field >>> works better. >>> >> >> I agree that tags are quick ad hoc categorising, but I think tags is also >> "more" (wiki structure). I also agree that fields work better in these >> category/value scenarios. >> >>> >>> Personally I try and avoid tags and use fields instead because I try not >>> to "pollute" the tag space. I may even use tags initially then migrate all >>> tiddlers so tagged to all tiddlers with a given field/value. >>> >> >> Here is the problem again (not with you but with the tech). You and >> others avoid using the tags because the tags fail at their job. Should we >> not fix the tag mechanism instead of adapting our behaviour? >> >> >>> Not withstanding my alternate approach what would I do if I had too many >>> tags. first I would find a way to divide them into subsets, the simplest >>> being tags with a given tag, or tiddler vs system tiddler. It is only once >>> you find a way to group your tags can you build something to view a subset >>> of tags. I would tend to keep the default drop down or tag search and build >>> another restricted in some way by a filter. For example every status tag >>> could have the field status and have a method to select a tag only from the >>> status tags etc... The selection of status tag may only appear on tiddlers >>> with an field object-type with the value task, object-type[task]. >>> >>> However for a really intense user of tags marios alttags/gentags plugin >>> allows you define multiple tag fields, and the available tags in each >>> alternative tag group are only search for within the existing tags used in >>> that tag field. >>> >>> In the longer term I would like to see us developing more list fields >>> like tags and provide a method to migrate tags to these alternatives. Tags >>> are a wonderful free method of "tagging" but more often that not we >>> actually use tags as keyword list, a status of which a tiddler can only >>> have one at a time, or primary categories where only one category can be >>> assigned and/or multiple category fields. Another is a keyword field that >>> one adds search terms you want found but that do not necessarily appear in >>> the tiddler. >>> >>> I think we have opposite views here. A separatist vs a unionist :) >> you want to make subsets of tags and @P Marios gentag makes subset of >> tagfields. You say that "more often that not we actually use tags as >> keyword list,... or primary categories " But why only one at a time? In my >> view this is exactly the power of tags. I want my wiki to grow buttn-up. I >> dont want to make a distinction betwene keyword and category before the >> difference present itself. Therefore I want the tags to simultaniusly be >> keywords, categories and search terms. I need to go with the flow (maybe I >> should start a new threat to go deeper in this). >> >> I think the problem with using special fields or an extra special >> tag-field is that you don't have one place to look for something. Fields >> are great for custom things, but tags are better. I think tags has some big >> advantages "out of the box": >> >> >> - automatic toc >> - drop down picker (when it works ;)) >> - colouring >> - consistency across different wikis >> >> >> Let us take advantages of that instead of avoiding tags. Make tags great >> again. >> >> In the world of data/knowledge and Information management there are a set >>> of well known concepts such as tags and categories (subjects/Domains/Genra >>> are others), for which I would like to see a mechanisium to define and use >>> these as part of the Standard distribution. To me these would mitigate the >>> need to deal with large numbers of tags. >>> >> >> Do you care to talk some more about the world of information management >> and the utility of well known concepts? this could be interesting >> >>> >>> Not withstanding my different approach I see no reason not to enable a >>> filtered tag selector to help in your case. Let me know if you would like >>> one developed. I think a tag pill style that allowed to to tag from its >>> dropdown according to a filter would be nice. >>> >>> Yes, thank you I would. I'm imaging a filter that limit the length of >> the tag drop-down list and a setting for the user to set that limit. I >> don't know it if would be too much, but it could be useful to have a >> fourth/back arrow to cycle to the next e.g. 10 hits, or if not, just a >> button to show all. But maybe this would be redundant because you get more >> precise results when you type. >> >> Regards >>> Tony >>> >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/53ae7f7e-57a7-4834-8ff4-275f2524d010%40googlegroups.com.
