Ciao Mat Round 2 :-)
Mat wrote: > > ... it is of course trivial to type "I love TiddlyWiki" on paper as well > as in a tiddler. It is also trivial, on paper, to write+draw "I ❤ > TiddlyWiki" but this is typically impractical when making a tiddler note. A > drawing from a touch pad is, in my experience, a rough sketch so it is > rarely useful outside of an *immediate* context e.g some explanation. > > ... drawn images such as ❤ should ideally not have to be separate > tiddlers as it really is no more separate than when we type the word > "love" in a sentence. > Emoji combined characters work natively in TW. But I think you mean actual images embedded in a Tiddler? > That some scribbles are really part of the text is even more obvious when > one considers annotations such as underlines or margin scribbles. (I made > the transparent canvas proposal > <https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/4035> partly for this > reason, i.e to be able to circumvent having to create a new tiddler and > transclude it.) > > This is image-in-text problem is not unique to TW of course. I could not > scribble a heart in this very google post either. > Right. a couple of things occur to me to maybe look at ... *Editor* behaviour. Part of the issue is ability to make/insert images during edit without segway to a separate Tiddler. Mark S. and BTC some time ago suggested some proofs of concept of *creating new Tiddlers inline during edit without segway*. I have not had time to fully test their code ideas which I think are very neat and want to get working well sometime. To get an idea see: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/B0VGpW27MC4/bNVAKOxCCQAJ. *Placement*. I'd say that easier setting size of the insertion and its placement would matter. In old tools like Word, insertions can be sized & scaled in context using either handles at the edge of the inserted image or manual numeric sizing. Drag-to-Move placement within context is also common with text reflow. Other types of tool overlay the item in an invisible box at some point relative to the containing div. I guess what I'm wondering if much of this could be achieved through some form of transclusion -- maybe with addition of an approach to editing similar to last point. Thoughts TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5bf5d489-42a0-4203-9ffc-d96f94afd248%40googlegroups.com.
