TonyM wrote: > > A Graphical markup language to describe such images and elements of images >>> is overdue as is a way to convert hand drawn objects to computerise them >>> "beyond the bitmap". >>> >> >> Actually they exist. Images have held meta-data for a long time and the >> schema are extensible. The issue is the specific "Bridge" needed in the >> document between image and text. Vector graphics are far superior here in >> that their conceptual structure is a language of types already. >> >> > Actually I am thinking of something a little more innovative. There was a > google project that test something a bit like what I am thinking. > > An example would to be able to describe a table, as a flat surface 3m by > 5m (5cm thick) standing on 4 legs 1m high and 20cm diameter round. Each leg > in 30cm from each corner. >
Right. So you have a formal description that a user ADDS, right? Image EXIF fields will take that for major bitmap formats. IF you mean that some software works out its an image of a table, well Nice, but I can't see that working in TW anytime soon :-) TT > The above is enough for us humans to do a lot with, picture in our minds > eye, but most computers will say "I do not compute". > > Regards > Tony > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/06e9070e-b809-4b92-ab7d-5e8e3e074fc7%40googlegroups.com.
