Mat wrote: > > That some scribbles are really part of the text is even more obvious when > one considers annotations such as underlines or margin scribbles. (I made > the transparent canvas proposal > <https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/4035> partly for this > reason, i.e to be able to circumvent having to create a new tiddler and > transclude it.) >
Round 3. *Raw in Tiddler v. transclusion*. Not sure how well that would work. You could inline using base-64 thingie. That blob would then be fully hard-coded in-line. But for bitmap blobs you'd still have the same issues on scale but without the manipulable possibilities of transclusion? It seems to me transclusion is good. Perhaps the issue is about how to have a more "live" methodology in edit to create transcluded Tiddlers and edit them inline at will? Thoughts TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/65b3d71e-7b64-4a17-9eee-614a19ec9479%40googlegroups.com.
