> > Maybe it might make more sense to have TiddlyWiki as-is, but maybe keep > TiddlyWiki as a "community edition", and have an exact copy of it re-badged > for marketing purposes (a "professional edition")? With a name that > doesn't have either "Tiddly" or "Wiki" in it? I suppose "Tiddler" would > also need renaming? >
This is *exactly* what I was trying to say in the previous thread, and I got laughed at...I still think this is the best way to go. SomethingSomething as a wrapper for audiences not familiar with TiddlyWiki, and good old TiddlyWiki, name and all, for the community and search results, etc. The SomethingSomething could even display that it is 'powered by TiddlyWiki'. > > > > On Monday, March 2, 2020 at 9:08:23 AM UTC-4, bimlas wrote: >> >> Continuation of the >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywiki/MKVwkEmCimQ thread. >> >> In a nutshell: TiddlyWiki is gaining popularity because it appears in >> more articles and podcasts, but most of the time they smile at its name, so >> it doesn't seem to be taken seriously (although at the end of the test they >> usually praise the software itself). The name TiddlyWiki may hinder its >> distribution, so we should consider renaming it. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/804f12d3-930f-4d03-8420-743571e445a8%40googlegroups.com.
