On Tuesday, March 3, 2020 at 10:35:53 AM UTC+1, PMario wrote: ... > We may be able to create a \rules use <regexp> dot-paragraph ... Which > can do something sensible, if the "dot-paragraph" inline parser is missing. > > eg: hide the leading dot, but show a "dot-paragraph parser is missing" > message somewhere. ... A more intelligent solution would be an "import the > missing stuff" dialogue ;) >
In an ideal world, TW would know, where to lookup the address to safely import the missing plugin. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9d31b6a3-fbb9-4ff1-9932-499139201b7e%40googlegroups.com.
