On Tuesday, March 3, 2020 at 2:53:05 PM UTC+1, TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > PMario wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, March 3, 2020 at 10:44:01 AM UTC+1, TonyM wrote: >> ... >> >>> Sounds good. What is the best way to proceed for a dot-paragraph?, and >>> ideally so others can be added if desired. >>> >> >> I just found out, that we can't use a "global" dot-paragraph rule since >> it messes with the TW stylesheet parsing. >> > > What simple, single, characters are left for Tony? > > Also, would ".." work? >
I did experiment with the ´ tick ... acute accent like so: ´´´ for level 3 paragraph _and_ ´<tab><tab> also level 3 I personally like the second version, since it creates plain text, which shows a human readable indentation. .. but 2 tabs in a default text editor create a 16 character wide indent, which is ugly. ´<tab><tab>.test some text ... will create a paragraph with class="test" ... Even if it is consistent, this construction looks strange ... ´´´.test some text ... feels better, since it is already known. The tick, could be a problem with some keyboard layouts. ... A .<space> would work but would probably loose the level _and_ class setting, or make the whole parser logic much much more complicated. It's not ideal. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b86118a9-e9dc-45b5-af9f-0fd821ed15b9%40googlegroups.com.
