PMario wrote: > > We may be able to create a \rules use <regexp> dot-paragraph ... Which > can do something sensible, if the "dot-paragraph" inline parser is missing. >
Wondering if the idea here is extensible? For example ... \rules use <regexp> three-lead-spaces In other words, generic ability for the user to add BESPOKE RULES using regex? IF so I think it would be excellent. It could, maybe, solve Tony's issue and simultaneously make the parsing process less obscure and practically extensible? Very glad you are looking at it! Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8d62c32c-443d-4449-a418-1afca59b6a41%40googlegroups.com.
