> > TonyM wrote: > > In my case I already use ":" to indent and make an effective paragraph, >> > PMario wrote:
> No you create a Description Details element > <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/dd> ... that's > a different thing. ... You are basically "misusing" it, because there is no > visual difference. > > But there is a semantic difference. eg: If you copy paste the html code > into a different app, that tries to make sense out of the html structure, > it will be confused. > One of the reasons the semantics get misused quite often is that the lack of an alternative approach in markup. It makes sense to be non-semantic because IF you can get the outcome to look like what you need then you not too bothered about the semantic level. Its your wiki, not generalist compatability. I DO agree that *ideally* its much better to stay semantic, but users will often be focused on visual outcome that serves their immediate aim. So I think TonyM's interest in an extensible markup is very relevant both to enable his aim and keep semantic. A comment TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/33af7696-8b37-423c-8337-af1517432cd4%40googlegroups.com.
