On Tuesday, March 3, 2020 at 12:43:12 PM UTC+1, TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > PMario wrote: >> >> We may be able to create a \rules use <regexp> dot-paragraph ... Which >> can do something sensible, if the "dot-paragraph" inline parser is missing. >> > > Wondering if the idea here is extensible? For example ... > > \rules use <regexp> three-lead-spaces > > As I wrote in an earlier post <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/BJe7X-0jhSc/rZesjdNMAgAJ>, I want to be able to set classes too. like ´.test and also indent a paragraph like: ´´´ some text
I was thinking about a possibility to use tabs to indent paragraphs. .. I would need to test <tab><tab>.test-class some text In other words, generic ability for the user to add BESPOKE RULES using > regex? > It may be possible. The biggest concern I have is, that we create a new "Tower of Babel", where TW-A wikitext isn't compatible with TW-B wikitext. > IF so I think it would be excellent. It could, maybe, solve Tony's issue > and simultaneously make the parsing process less obscure and practically > extensible? > I'm OK with extensibility. ... But it has to be in a way, that solves more problems, than it creates. -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/27ea1f1b-8fcf-48a7-80df-f2b9bb67ac83%40googlegroups.com.
