>
> (This is pretty difficult to get right.)
Its a very interesting regex issue. Regex often looks counter intuitive.
Using negatives can get complicated.
It IS possible to match the needed in one regex. But you would have to chop
off the suffix since we can't currently do that by silent non-capturing,
then reinstate it so that the "<<" becomes ">><<"
(<<foo([^>])*?)([<]{2})
That matches this ...
[image: Annotation 2020-03-08 130948.jpg]
--|match|--
<< suffix to replace
TT
Mat wrote:
>
> More compact:
>
> Find the *first* "<<foo "
> ...that is not followed by "....>>" (where .... signifies any number of
> characters, including none)
> ...OR that IS followed by "....<<" or character/s that is forbidden
> inside a short form macro call.
>
>
> (This is pretty difficult to get right.)
>
> <:-)
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4dc95947-6f8b-4189-af66-0c5e18e379f4%40googlegroups.com.
