On Saturday, March 7, 2020 at 10:21:28 PM UTC+1, Mat wrote: > > More compact: > > Find the *first* "<<foo " > ...that is not followed by "....>>" (where .... signifies any number of > characters, including none) > ...OR that IS followed by "....<<" or character/s that is forbidden > inside a short form macro call. > > > (This is pretty difficult to get right.) >
I think, the same problem applies that Jeremy had, to detect this pattern. So if it could be detected, it would be valid syntax. IMO you can _not_ detect this pattern in 1 run. You would have to find every appearance with: <<foo[^<]* which finds <<xxxx<< ... In a second step you have to see if xxxx contains >> .. If yes -> OK ... If no problem. 1 regexp filter can't handle this. Especially, since our filters return tiddler names and not regexp capture groups, which would be needed. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/895dcecd-d95b-463c-a5c4-c9b2d8e7ce25%40googlegroups.com.
