Ciao Mat I'd also test this with "<<foo[^<]*?". The final qualifier "?" means that "not <" will only march along the scope to the character just before the first proximal occurrence of "<". Under some conditions, without it, it might match the final occurrence.
TT On Sunday, 8 March 2020 09:51:08 UTC+1, Mat wrote: > > IMO you can _not_ detect this pattern in 1 run. You would have to find >> every appearance with: <<foo[^<]* which finds <<xxxx<< ... In a second step >> you have to see if xxxx contains >> .. If yes -> OK ... If no problem. >> > > OK, I don't think it is necessary with one step for EditorMagic > considering how it is the text of a single tiddler that is searched so it > should be pretty fast regardless. With <<foo[^<]* as a start (thank you!) > I'll see what I can come up with. > > <:-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/70fd5b77-b549-4fbb-b762-98c05b28980a%40googlegroups.com.
