Jed Carty wrote:
>
> I think that Jeremy's description is fair. I have seen many people decide 
> they are not going to contribute a plugin because they think that they 
> don't fit the quality standards required, I don't remember ever seeing a 
> plugin rejected because of that.
>

Right. 

... For a long time I was maintaining a listing of available plugins on the 
> wiki reference wiki as a sort of plugin store, but it was barely used so I 
> stopped. Setting up a system for adding plugins could be a significant time 
> investment and from experience if it is just one of the more experienced 
> devs doing it no one is going to use it.
>

I more than agree. Even though I don't contribute much to TW (embarrassed), 
I absolutely see this pattern.

The question in my mind is whether a central repository might ease this 
frustration of dedicated doing for no more than one-man-and-a-dog. 
Fragmentation of resources? Not sure. Not enough users overall? Not sure. 
More capability in TW than actual need? Not sure. 

But there sure IS an issue.

Best wishes
TT

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b0849349-5702-4b63-8446-09cddfed2dda%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to