TT. My simple questions are ...
> > - can we look after the ill AND not have lockdown for the whole society? > > Sure. Right now when the system gets overwhelmed we deselect the old and sick. With less and less health workers surviving, you would of course have to deselect more and more groups from getting treatment. (Resulting in many more death) Would you be able to find any more volunteers to do the treatments? - what are the consequences of lock-down economically? > > Higher than we know I am sure. Leaving every country with a hefty depth, peoples savings have vanished and the pension savings will have lost in value. - given that the virus will "wave" after lockdown repeatedly do you think > it is viable to lockdown repeatedly? > > Hm. Not having lock down does not mean that people have the money or demands for the same products. Not knowing if the hairdresser is infectious, would you go for a blond treatment, having the highlighted stripes, the hair extension and some tan. It might be a "beauty to die for" > TT > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f9800c25-12b7-43da-8f69-620e6f494a48%40googlegroups.com.
