Birthe, That may be true, good point. They should be documented well, but a lot of people use tiddlyfox to refer to the FireFox browser plugin (which is not longer) one stable releases so we should stop saying it and qualify ourselves if we must say it.
To make it more complex I believe there is a reference to tiddlyfox on some of the "modern solutions" code base. I have seen discussions where someone cant make it work, or still critisises TiddlyWiki because of the apocolypse when it is simply not true. I am just asking for clarity. Regards Tony On Sunday, 3 May 2020 13:21:26 UTC+10, Birthe C wrote: > > TonyM, > > We have often been told, that people using Waterfox, Palemoon and other > browsers, did use tiddlyfox. It would be good, if we knew exactly what > other browsers to make examples in a possible rewrite. > > Others are using older computers, minimal linux'es and have to find some > usable browser for their system. Some are running totally of a USB stick. > > Birthe > > søndag den 3. maj 2020 kl. 03.49.50 UTC+2 skrev TonyM: >> >> To all, >> >> Does anyone really use tiddlyfox in a backdated version of the browser >> rather than use the new superior Timimi ? >> >> The minimum reference to the apocalypse, which we recovered from, we are >> "post apocalypse", would be wise, I am always needing to tell people about >> Timimi because "tiddlyfox" misleads. >> >> Regards >> Tony >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e0e7aab0-5138-48cc-b3e5-ffa7a3507c14%40googlegroups.com.
