bimlas wrote: > > > https://sociologica.unibo.it/article/view/8350/8270 >
That article is good. Very good for social scientists. One thing in it that is well explained is how Luhmann, years before other sociologists, abandoned hierarchy based categories in favour of "surprising linked networks" (my term). Luhmann's feeling for "linking" prefigures what came on the net. It was radical at the time. And, most important, it worked. In some ways maybe still ahead of what is actually happening. In relation to TW I doubt Luhmann would like TOC's based on the HTML "li" construct, which is the narrowing tree structure he totally avoided :-). TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/61c5951c-1540-45f4-83a3-4ca8901de136%40googlegroups.com.
