Si, I added an issue 
<https://github.com/sobjornstad/TiddlyRemember/issues/7> for this. If you 
have thoughts on how the password should be requested and/or stored, let me 
know.

Sebastian, answering on the issue you posted.

On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 3:19:54 PM UTC-5, Sebastián Ortega wrote:
>
> You make my day when I read Anki + Tiddlywiki!
>
> However syncing doesn't work for me. I've posted the details to a github 
> issue: https://github.com/sobjornstad/TiddlyRemember/issues/6
>
> Anyway, thanks a lot for the project
>
> On Monday, 25 May 2020 04:26:29 UTC+2, Soren Bjornstad wrote:
>>
>> I'm pleased to announce the release of version 1.0 of TiddlyRemember, a 
>> tool to make it easy to remember the most important bits of your notes. You 
>> call out specific bits of your tiddlers that you want to remember using 
>> TiddlyWiki macros, and an associated Anki <https://apps.ankiweb.net> 
>> add-on then pulls these snippets into Anki where you can review them 
>> regularly. The Anki cards link back to the tiddler they came from so you 
>> can find the context if you need it, and if you edit the content in 
>> TiddlyWiki or move it around, your Anki collection gets updated to match on 
>> your next sync, maintaining your review history.
>>
>> Here's a little snip of the syntax, the rendering in a TiddlyWiki, and 
>> the card in Anki (permalink to this page in the docs 
>> <https://sobjornstad.github.io/TiddlyRemember/#Question-and-answer+notes>
>> ):
>>
>> [image: syntax.png]
>>
>> There are cloze deletion cards too (if you're not a memory geek, you 
>> might call these "fill in the blanks cards").
>>
>> Credit for this idea goes to Andy Matuschak, who reported building a 
>> private tool that worked similarly for his notes system 
>> <https://notes.andymatuschak.org/>. I cannot for the life of me find 
>> this note now (if someone knows where it is, please post the link!).
>>
>> Check it out and install from here: 
>> https://sobjornstad.github.io/TiddlyRemember/.
>>
>> I'm hoping this is a reasonably stable and functional version (thus the 
>> 1.0.0 moniker), but I've only been using it myself for a couple of weeks as 
>> I've been developing, and there are definitely improvements possible, so 
>> suggestions and pull requests are welcome! The two biggest areas for 
>> improvement I see that I'm not sure how to attack are:
>>
>>    - You have to have TiddlyWiki installed on Node on your system to use 
>>    TiddlyRemember. (You can use TiddlyRemember fine with a single-file wiki 
>>    though. It just has to be there for TiddlyRemember to call out to.) 
>> There's 
>>    no way around this I can think if if you want a fully automated sync (the 
>>    Anki add-on needs some way to run TiddlyWiki commands unless it wants to 
>>    duplicate the wiki parser), but I could imagine a way to use the new 
>>    browser-based static site generator tool as part of a two-step process 
>>    where you export.
>>    - In order to extract the questions, TiddlyRemember renders all the 
>>    tiddlers in your wiki and then parses the resulting HTML, which means it 
>>    will end up pulling multiple copies of a question if the tiddler 
>> containing 
>>    a question is transcluded into another tiddler that's included in the 
>> sync. 
>>    It will happily remove duplicates, but there's no way for it to tell 
>> which 
>>    tiddler is the "original source", so it picks whichever one it happens to 
>>    process first, which isn't great. I don't tend to use transclusion much 
>>    aside from adding templates to things and building up system tiddlers and 
>>    sidebar tabs, so this isn't a big deal for me, but it might be for others.
>>       - I originally planned to make each question a tiddler of its own; 
>>       while this seemed more philosophically pure, I eventually decided 
>> against 
>>       this approach because I didn't like the idea of having to separately 
>> edit a 
>>       bunch of subtiddlers for all of my notes, and because having the 
>> question 
>>       included in a tiddler allows the source to be automatically determined 
>>       without having to link back to it and update it if you move the 
>> question 
>>       around (aside from the transclusion issue). But I could see an 
>> argument for 
>>       doing it as transcluded question tiddlers, and maybe we could support 
>> that 
>>       as an alternative method eventually (especially if it becomes easier 
>> to 
>>       edit transcluded tiddlers in a future version of TiddlyWiki).
>>    
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e4569cce-ed7c-4883-849d-c93d1c64acc5%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to