> > Si, I added an issue > <https://github.com/sobjornstad/TiddlyRemember/issues/7> for this. If you > have thoughts on how the password should be requested and/or stored, let me > know. >
Being forced to use my wiki without a password has made me realise how much faster it runs without encryption, so I'm retracting my vote for this feature (sorry)! However I'm sure that it would be useful to others. Credit for this idea goes to Andy Matuschak, who reported building a > private tool that worked similarly for his notes system > <https://notes.andymatuschak.org/>. I cannot for the life of me find this > note now (if someone knows where it is, please post the link!). > I have just come across the notes where he talks about the "mnemonic medium" for personal notes, which look like they might be what you are referring to: https://notes.andymatuschak.org/The_mnemonic_medium_can_be_extended_to_one%E2%80%99s_personal_notes https://notes.andymatuschak.org/My_implementation_of_a_personal_mnemonic_medium On Friday, 29 May 2020 02:40:24 UTC+1, Soren Bjornstad wrote: > > Si, I added an issue > <https://github.com/sobjornstad/TiddlyRemember/issues/7> for this. If you > have thoughts on how the password should be requested and/or stored, let me > know. > > Sebastian, answering on the issue you posted. > > On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 3:19:54 PM UTC-5, Sebastián Ortega wrote: >> >> You make my day when I read Anki + Tiddlywiki! >> >> However syncing doesn't work for me. I've posted the details to a github >> issue: https://github.com/sobjornstad/TiddlyRemember/issues/6 >> >> Anyway, thanks a lot for the project >> >> On Monday, 25 May 2020 04:26:29 UTC+2, Soren Bjornstad wrote: >>> >>> I'm pleased to announce the release of version 1.0 of TiddlyRemember, a >>> tool to make it easy to remember the most important bits of your notes. You >>> call out specific bits of your tiddlers that you want to remember using >>> TiddlyWiki macros, and an associated Anki <https://apps.ankiweb.net> >>> add-on then pulls these snippets into Anki where you can review them >>> regularly. The Anki cards link back to the tiddler they came from so you >>> can find the context if you need it, and if you edit the content in >>> TiddlyWiki or move it around, your Anki collection gets updated to match on >>> your next sync, maintaining your review history. >>> >>> Here's a little snip of the syntax, the rendering in a TiddlyWiki, and >>> the card in Anki (permalink to this page in the docs >>> <https://sobjornstad.github.io/TiddlyRemember/#Question-and-answer+notes> >>> ): >>> >>> [image: syntax.png] >>> >>> There are cloze deletion cards too (if you're not a memory geek, you >>> might call these "fill in the blanks cards"). >>> >>> Credit for this idea goes to Andy Matuschak, who reported building a >>> private tool that worked similarly for his notes system >>> <https://notes.andymatuschak.org/>. I cannot for the life of me find >>> this note now (if someone knows where it is, please post the link!). >>> >>> Check it out and install from here: >>> https://sobjornstad.github.io/TiddlyRemember/. >>> >>> I'm hoping this is a reasonably stable and functional version (thus the >>> 1.0.0 moniker), but I've only been using it myself for a couple of weeks as >>> I've been developing, and there are definitely improvements possible, so >>> suggestions and pull requests are welcome! The two biggest areas for >>> improvement I see that I'm not sure how to attack are: >>> >>> - You have to have TiddlyWiki installed on Node on your system to >>> use TiddlyRemember. (You can use TiddlyRemember fine with a single-file >>> wiki though. It just has to be there for TiddlyRemember to call out to.) >>> There's no way around this I can think if if you want a fully automated >>> sync (the Anki add-on needs some way to run TiddlyWiki commands unless >>> it >>> wants to duplicate the wiki parser), but I could imagine a way to use >>> the >>> new browser-based static site generator tool as part of a two-step >>> process >>> where you export. >>> - In order to extract the questions, TiddlyRemember renders all the >>> tiddlers in your wiki and then parses the resulting HTML, which means it >>> will end up pulling multiple copies of a question if the tiddler >>> containing >>> a question is transcluded into another tiddler that's included in the >>> sync. >>> It will happily remove duplicates, but there's no way for it to tell >>> which >>> tiddler is the "original source", so it picks whichever one it happens >>> to >>> process first, which isn't great. I don't tend to use transclusion much >>> aside from adding templates to things and building up system tiddlers >>> and >>> sidebar tabs, so this isn't a big deal for me, but it might be for >>> others. >>> - I originally planned to make each question a tiddler of its >>> own; while this seemed more philosophically pure, I eventually >>> decided >>> against this approach because I didn't like the idea of having to >>> separately edit a bunch of subtiddlers for all of my notes, and >>> because >>> having the question included in a tiddler allows the source to be >>> automatically determined without having to link back to it and update >>> it if >>> you move the question around (aside from the transclusion issue). But >>> I >>> could see an argument for doing it as transcluded question tiddlers, >>> and >>> maybe we could support that as an alternative method eventually >>> (especially >>> if it becomes easier to edit transcluded tiddlers in a future version >>> of >>> TiddlyWiki). >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/6edba8ae-aea6-4af3-acdd-4dfd44f05727%40googlegroups.com.
