Ash, I am not an aesthetic champion, but it is interesting to me. However your annotation [*] to me, seems to be designed to indicate an exception, however it appears to be the rule. Is this making it more complex than need be?, even although it looks OK.
- I suppose the main criteria to drive such a design is who is the main audience? and on what devices. - I was reading the page in a bright room, and in this case I would like more contrast. - I love being able to zoom in and out with tiddlywiki, so I can re-frame and scale according to content. - Have you limited the width of tiddlers? Regards Tony On Tuesday, June 30, 2020 at 10:07:56 AM UTC+10, Ash Rubigo wrote: > > Hi, > > It'd be great to get some feedback on on the aesthetic, layout, and > navigability of my wiki http://www.ashrubigo.com/. The content itself is > very work-in-progress, so don't pay much attention to that. > > I tried to make the CSS very consistent, minimal, and dark, because the > wiki will have a lot of media on it eventually. > http://www.ashrubigo.com/#manual--nodius for a page with lot's of > pictures. > > I'm thinking it's not very palatable for mainstream audiences, not really > sure what it needs though. > > Thanks! > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/fc5f4085-fc90-4d4e-9135-e3549e312befo%40googlegroups.com.
