G'day TW Tones and all, This is such an awesome thread. And I'm oh-so-envious of how all of you are so smoking good at eloquently expressing them quality thoughts.
With the wiki product I use at work to document the software system I support, I have the information componentized to the hilt so that I can provide the various information views for various purposes/audiences: operational support, project/task management, user help/guides, architectural, change logs, release planning/history, help desk ... ad infinitum, ad nauseum. So write once, use and reuse everywhere. Intertwingled journeys galore. Just throwing that out there 'cause TW Tones' example use case of multiple views gets my intertwingularity mojo right excited. *(Yeah, I love this stuff. It just tends to hurtle out of me like overcooked spaghetti flung at a wall.)* Huh, everything is linked to everything else by pretty much one degree of separation. I just got a flashback to the Patch Adams "pool of noodles" scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5RN8cYKCJ4 On Tuesday, July 21, 2020 at 8:47:50 AM UTC-3, TW Tones wrote: > > CJ, > > >> Sure, when writing a book in TiddlyWiki, you can certainly provide >> different sequences for content, but that gets hard trying to imagine >> different sequences. Much easier to provide just one linear journey, but >> if you think of different linear journeys: cool. >> > > This comment reminds me of a compelling use I put tiddlywiki to before I > decided to go out on my own as a business. My last working resume was built > in tiddlywiki. I could customise and generate multiple views according to > who I was sending it to, including shot and long forms. I even had pdf and > word versions generated and available to the reader. > > Dynamic and adaptive documents are really good in tiddlywiki. > > One conceptual leap I have heard of which is not yet a reality is using > analytics more. In this case the way you use a document can have all kind > of analytics on your use collected then provided back to you so you can > learn about your own interaction with the document. and also provide > insight into your interests and all before we even consider alternate > versions like the readers digest version included with the full version, > annotations and automatic glossaries and more. > > The thing is what can be done with such interactive documents is still in > its infancy. > > Regards > Tony > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c426b2c5-1d76-4a6d-9742-883d8d55a588o%40googlegroups.com.
